Vortex 16-48x65 Spotter Review, by Jordon Kauer

• Jan 4, 2016

• #1

robby denning

Administrator

Staff member

Joined

Feb 25, 2012

Messages

15,682

Location

SE Idaho

Hey Roksliders,
I want you to meet Jordan Kauer. He's a member (spdrman) and spends a lot of time in the Idaho woods hunting and- by default- testing out some gear.

In this review, he gives us the goods on Votex's 16-48x but also compares it with it's bigger cousin, the 20-60x85 Vortex. I knew this might be interesting to those wondering if they should go big or go home. Here you go and give Jordan a big welcome.

http://www.rokslide.com/2012-01-09-05-09-42/optics/387-vortex-16-48x-65-spotter-review

 

Last edited: Mar 25, 2016

• Jan 25, 2016

• #2

spdrman

WKR

Joined

Dec 3, 2012

Messages

459

More than happy to answer some questions!

 

• Jan 25, 2016

• #3

N

novaman64

Lil-Rokslider

Joined

Jan 24, 2016

Messages

104

Location

Nor Cal

How does this compare to the viper line of glass? Or the vanguard for the matter? Those are the other 2 I am considering...

 

• Jan 27, 2016

• #4

spdrman

WKR

Joined

Dec 3, 2012

Messages

459

novaman64 said:

How does this compare to the viper line of glass? Or the vanguard for the matter? Those are the other 2 I am considering...

Click to expand...

I've never seen a vangaurd in person so cant give an opinion on that one. I have several friends with the viper series and they are great spotters, price is about half of what the razor is and for the price point I think it would be a great option

 

• Feb 8, 2016

• #5

N

novaman64

Lil-Rokslider

Joined

Jan 24, 2016

Messages

104

Location

Nor Cal

spdrman said:

I've never seen a vangaurd in person so cant give an opinion on that one. I have several friends with the viper series and they are great spotters, price is about half of what the razor is and for the price point I think it would be a great option

Click to expand...

Went down to the local sportsmans warehouse this weekend. Just as the sun started going down, took a Swaro, Razor HD and Viper HD out to the parking lot. Salesman was telling me it was the same glass between the Viper and Razor and was just paying for a lighter body, looking through them I would disagree. Viper is good glass, but in the low light looking at a tree far away (800-1000 yards) I would see fine detail in the branches with the Razor, where as the Viper was a little fuzzy. The Swaro was a ATS 80 so had a unfair advantage, and def brought in way more light and was beyond clear... I wish I had the cash for one....

 

• Feb 12, 2016

• #6

D

duckhunter175

WKR

Joined

Dec 28, 2013

Messages

860

Location

Dallas

Great review! Got my Razor 16-48x65 last season and have loved it.

 

• Feb 12, 2016

• #7

spdrman

WKR

Joined

Dec 3, 2012

Messages

459

Thanks duckhunter175, hasn't let me down yet either!

Novaman64 be nice if there was a way yo get them all in the mountaina and do a true side by side in the conditions we mainly use them in.

 

• Jun 30, 2016

• #8

Johnboy

WKR

Joined

Dec 12, 2014

Messages

541

Robby, what tripod do you use and prefer for this scope? I'm considering purchase of this exact scope.

 

• Jul 1, 2016

• Thread Starter
• #9

OP

robby denning

Administrator

Staff member

Joined

Feb 25, 2012

Messages

15,682

Location

SE Idaho

Hi Johnboy
I wasn't the one who wrote the review but I'm currently running a big carbon swarovski tripod for glassing close to the pickup, a carbon vanguard for hiking around, and an old Leuopold compact for the backcountry. I use Manfrotto heads

Brock Akers has had good luck with the Slik 624 and Promaster XC525c. He wrote a good review here Backcountry Tripods: Slik 624 vs Promaster XC525C

Also, reach out to Jordan who authored this article. Send him a PM

 

• Jul 2, 2016

• #10

spdrman

WKR

Joined

Dec 3, 2012

Messages

459

Johnboy, sent ya a PM, I'm using a Slik sprint mini ii with a panhead.

 

• Jul 3, 2016

• #11

J

johnandersonm777

FNG

Joined

Jun 23, 2016

Messages

11

Location

South Carolina

Saw your Vortex 16-48x 65mm Spotter Review and I'm impressed to buy one. Thanks.

 

• Aug 23, 2016

• #12

S

striker3

Lil-Rokslider

Joined

Sep 16, 2015

Messages

206

Location

Bozeman, Mt

Just wanted to say thanks for the review. With the price drop on these now discontinued models they are in my price range, but I didn't know if I wanted the 65 or 80. When I hear about larger objectives letting you glass longer at dusk and dawn, I didn't realize we were talking about a few minutes only. Made the decision to pick the 65mm for the backcountry easier.

 

• Aug 23, 2016

• #13

spdrman

WKR

Joined

Dec 3, 2012

Messages

459

Thanks striker3! Now would be a great time to buy the model that was reviewed here! Weight savings between the two made it easy to decide, the new model 65mm is 8oz heavier then this one. Hoping to have my hands on one soon to see if it's worth the extra weight

Jordan