BAKPAKR
WKR
Locking turret wasn’t a patent issue, the OEM stated that the locking turret systems reduce reliability/zero retention and pushed to not use them.
Should people be wary of their Nightforce ATACRs because of this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Locking turret wasn’t a patent issue, the OEM stated that the locking turret systems reduce reliability/zero retention and pushed to not use them.
Nah, but those Lee-oh-polesShould people be wary of their Nightforce ATACRs because of this?
Should people be wary of their Nightforce ATACRs because of this?
the claim I’m sure is that there are so many variables that a loss of zero may not be showing the scope is the issue.A better, and simpler question- why doesn’t any of them just go to the range, zero their rifle, drop and it and then see what happens..?
I once owned a Mk5hd that would click when you touched the top of the turret while it was zero locked LOLNah, but those Lee-oh-poles
They’ll getcha with their locked turrets
I was hoping to pick up a 4-16x42 cheap when that post started a panic sell-off.Nah, but those Lee-oh-poles
They’ll getcha with their locked turrets
Understood in regards to this scope.
For clarification are locking turrets a patent issue also (if you are familiar)? I feel like that has been stated and not sure if you can clear that up or not.
Should people be wary of their Nightforce ATACRs because of this?
Hah. My mk4 has had the windage spin while “locked” two different times during matches. Beyond frustrating.I once owned a Mk5hd that would click when you touched the top of the turret while it was zero locked LOL
Because you are correct with the statement that nobody actually shoots. It’s true.A better, and simpler question- why doesn’t any of them just go to the range, zero their rifle, drop and it and then see what happens..?
Their response would be that the drop doesn’t test the scope. If it moves, something else slipped (e.g. the mounts or bedding). And even if it’s not the mounts/bedding and is the scope, it’s only a sample of 1 so it doesn’t prove anything. Everyone makes a lemon, including NightForce. Even if you test several of each model and it’s always the same, it’s still anecdotal because you’re not testing a statistically significant number of the population. So we just have to trust the manufacturers are testing for side impact zero retention because either they say they are, some consultant for the industry says they are, or the .mil would have a huge claim if they weren’t, or competition shooters don’t have problems and are hard on scopes. I think that was the gist. It was kinda hard to follow the exact arguments other than repeated appeals to authority.A better, and simpler question- why doesn’t any of them just go to the range, zero their rifle, drop and it and then see what happens..?