Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hunt in PA so very similar woods to you. I really like the 3-9 swfa for this; it’s lighter and the reticle works great. The 3-18 THLR would definitely work since it’s still 3x on the low end; but it’s a bit overkill and heavy (26 oz) for a woods rifle. Heck, the 3-9 swfa is still 20 oz. I wouldn’t hesitate to take the 3-9 out west if I was ever given the opportunity; it really is an impressive scope.So, I shoot hunt in the thick woods of West Virginia, deer. Maybe 200 hundred yards.
Rifles are a 6mm arc and 7mm-08.
My chances of getting out "west" are very slim in the next few years, if ever.
As I don't know what I don't know.
What reticle would be best for my use case?
I'm going to buy one for sure when it happens, just want to get the right one.
And what are these "scope bumpers" I see mentioned?
looks interesting. Can someone explain the THLR to me? seems overly complicated vs the RMGH. But the RMGH is familiar from PRS style

Did someone really see "Zero Tech" and think.
YEP, THATS THE NAME WE BEEN LOOKING FOR!!!
Agree here. I think it's time to finally unwatch this thread now that the pre-orders are in. It's becoming pure noise. If you don't want the scope, don't buy it. Use your time elsewhere rather than posting negativity. (Could say the same about this postWho's name is on the bell is much less interesting than who built it. This is a LOW scope which is what really matters. Saying that though I've heard nothing but good things in relation to zerotechs customer service and the fact that they were willing to take on this project says a lot. I'm happy to support companies that listen to their customers and provide what has been asked for and not delivered by many other brands. If you've got anything of value to add regarding issues with zerotech as a company I'd be happy to hear it, but if your just here to talk them down with no substance no need to reply.
whos cares what the name is on it but the less branding the better.Whose name is on the bell is much less interesting than who built it. This is a LOW scope which is what really matters. Saying that though I've heard nothing but good things in relation to zerotechs customer service and the fact that they were willing to take on this project says a lot. I'm happy to support companies that listen to their customers and provide what has been asked for and not delivered by many other brands. If you've got anything of value to add regarding issues with zerotech as a company I'd be happy to hear it, but if your just here to talk them down with no substance no need to reply.



I guess I didn't notice what this is solving that the industry has been ignoring? Besides not being able to find the length of the scope without reading through the forum, it seems like just another scope to me....companies that listen to their customers and provide what has been asked for and not delivered by many other brands.
You mean like that big Shoot2Hunt logo on the side?In
whos cares what the name is on it but the less branding the better.
Almost all companies screw that up.
A reliable scope with a specific reticle is part of it. If it's not for you then feel free to move on.I guess I didn't notice what this is solving that the industry has been ignoring?
Does this hold true for left hand users? From your pics, looks like it could be an issue at lower mag. Is the lever removable?The throw lever placement is brilliant, staying out of the way of the bolt handle & hand during cycling even when spun to max magnification.
Does this hold true for left hand users? From your pics, looks like it could be an issue at lower mag. Is the lever removable?
To address the branding bullshit again, not a single time did I ever look at the scope in person and say "that's too much". Y'all need to take a wrap off and realize that animals don't give a shit about what's on the scope, and you shouldn't listen to other shooters/hunters who care more about looks than performance.
Bringing this thread back on track with some first-hand experience, happy to answer questions if I/other winter class users can.
The scopes performed well all week, with all three being used by various students on different days. No issues that weren't user-based were observed (no scope caps, so snow in objective and fogging/icing ocular from breathing don't count). The glass is very good, and with illumination there were no issues hitting targets at 460 yds past legal shooting light. The throw lever placement is brilliant, staying out of the way of the bolt handle & hand during cycling even when spun to max magnification. The eye box and eye relief are nice and forgiving, and the diopter/focus are fast to adjust and lock down very tight once set. The two scopes I used both tracked correctly and accurately even at low temperatures. The reticle is very good, the modified THLR is very fast to center your eye on and the 1 Mil box allows your eye to bracket the target and make accurate hits without overthinking or searching for it. The thicker posts are great in low light to bring your eye to center, and at ranges I would be interested in shooting an animal in low-light will allow for fast hits just from the tip of the vertical post. Wind holds are fast and easy to sort out on the fly, with clear visual cues as to what you're actually holding vs feeling like you're lost on counting .5 Mil ticks. It is hard to adequately explain how intuitive the reticle is, @THLR is a wizard.
I shot the S2H scope back to back with both a SWFA 3-9x and Maven RS1.2. I know what will be on my hunting rifles this fall, and it isn't those two.
View attachment 1026450
View attachment 1026451
View attachment 1026452
If you're not interested in the reticles, then this probably does nothing for you that a NightForce or Trijicon doesn't already do.I guess I didn't notice what this is solving that the industry has been ignoring? Besides not being able to find the length of the scope without reading through the forum, it seems like just another scope to me.
I like it's zero stop, locking diopter, illumination, and parallax. But none of that is new?
Not interested in any of the reticles....and that's always been a deal breaker for me.
Any noticeable increase in magnification stiffness in the cold? What temps are you guys at, btw?
Thanks for trying to pull the thread back to center.To address the branding bullshit again, not a single time did I ever look at the scope in person and say "that's too much". Y'all need to take a wrap off and realize that animals don't give a shit about what's on the scope, and you shouldn't listen to other shooters/hunters who care more about looks than performance.
Bringing this thread back on track with some first-hand experience, happy to answer questions if I/other winter class users can.
The scopes performed well all week, with all three being used by various students on different days. No issues that weren't user-based were observed (no scope caps, so snow in objective and fogging/icing ocular from breathing don't count). The glass is very good, and with illumination there were no issues hitting targets at 460 yds past legal shooting light. The throw lever placement is brilliant, staying out of the way of the bolt handle & hand during cycling even when spun to max magnification. The eye box and eye relief are nice and forgiving, and the diopter/focus are fast to adjust and lock down very tight once set. The two scopes I used both tracked correctly and accurately even at low temperatures. The reticle is very good, the modified THLR is very fast to center your eye on and the 1 Mil box allows your eye to bracket the target and make accurate hits without overthinking or searching for it. The thicker posts are great in low light to bring your eye to center, and at ranges I would be interested in shooting an animal in low-light will allow for fast hits just from the tip of the vertical post. Wind holds are fast and easy to sort out on the fly, with clear visual cues as to what you're actually holding vs feeling like you're lost on counting .5 Mil ticks. It is hard to adequately explain how intuitive the reticle is, @THLR is a wizard.
I shot the S2H scope back to back with both a SWFA 3-9x and Maven RS1.2. I know what will be on my hunting rifles this fall, and it isn't those two.
View attachment 1026450
View attachment 1026451
View attachment 1026452