- Thread Starter
- #21
Racethesunset
WKR
Thanks for reading the article.
You probably can tell from the reading it that the stx 95 is my favorite scope. How I use it depends on terrain and species but for deer, I often end up scanning/searching with it as much as I do my 10x42s on the tripod. I don't think there is an upgrade from the atx/sts/btx line as for as performance in the field (not that I have looked through). You can opt to go lighter and use the 65 and I did that that as well this season. There is a good chance the 95 will be in my pack for most of my backpacking hunts and scouting trips next year, it just helps identify animals at longer ranges better.
If animal quality isn't that big of a deal and identifying a big framed 175 from a tight framed 190 when they are a couple miles away isn't important then go with the lighter and smaller choice. The zoom on the stx 95 is clear and usable all the way to 70x. It saves miles walked and even more important, time.
There are much lighter and less expensive options, you have to figure out what is most important to you.
How would the BTX factor into your use case, if at all?
I ain’t no weight weenie.