- Banned
- #61
Seems like a bit of a slippery slope. What if Wyoming required reciprocity for state tag allocations? Your state doesn't offer 20% nonresident elk tags, you don't get an elk tag. Your state doesn't have nonresident sheep or moose or bison tags, No sheep moose or Bison hunt for you. Boom, no more out state hunting in Wyoming. because no other state offers as high of Nonresident tag allocations as Wyoming with as many species.
As I said before, Wyoming is still one of the best states for opportunity hunts in the US. Even with the Wilderness law a nonres, DIY hunter can get after it and have the opportunity to harvest very high quality animals. And for those that choose, you can hire a guide and hunt where ever.
There are plenty of other states to apply in if WY is being so crule to Non resident hunters.
Don't Like the Game, Don't Play,
I mostly agree with you. WY is the only state I'm collecting points in other than MT for the reasons you state. For the record, I didn't suggest this idea, I just really like the concept. But yeah, it's unrealistic and would have other consequences. I don't even hunt DWA's in MT so the odds I'll be doing in WY are slim to none!
The bottom line for me is that the idea of the government forcing people who want a particular experience (hunting in the WY wilderness, or hunting brown bears/sheep/goats in AK) to have to pay exorbitant fees to guides is just flat-out wrong. I wrote to my congressmen in MT this year on all of the guide-welfare garbage they were trying to pass even though it didn't really affect me in a negative way for that reason and I know a LOT of other MT residents who did the same.