Laramie
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2020
- Messages
- 2,962
90/10 creates no legal problems. Call it what you will.Forum white noise.
I'm still waiting for the lawsuit over the WY wilderness law, going to 90/10....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
90/10 creates no legal problems. Call it what you will.Forum white noise.
I'm still waiting for the lawsuit over the WY wilderness law, going to 90/10....
This thread has gotten off track, I want to hear more about this!!!! lolApply for a region, take a week to hunt, stay in a motel, and shoot it from the county road. No need for an outfitter.
Neither does changing a point system or even eliminating them. The state can do what they want with regards to nr hunting. You should know that.90/10 creates no legal problems. Call it what you will.
Point Creep is much worse in a Bonus Points system than a Preference Point one. Ask anyone in Washington. Preference Points are the best kind of points, and the only other viable option is Idaho's method.Well they need some sort of fix. If I was a top points guy I would want it to stay, but I'm not.
Where I live, they kept most units on the point creep regime but changed 2 high quality units to random draw, not squared points though, complete random and thats not great, no benefit to increase your odds. The zones that stayed on points give 2 tags out per year, and the top pool with 24 points has about 125 people in it.
They can do as they please but they will face legal issues if the system is changed or cancelled. They entered a legal agreement when they sold points under the original system. The director of WG&F, and their website at the time, made statements and advertised the system as a guarantee to their customers that they would be able to eventually draw. Changing to a squared or bonus system, would cancel that guarantee. You know that.Neither does changing a point system or even eliminating them. The state can do what they want with regards to nr hunting. You should know that.
That's not quite an accurate statement. In WA, drawing a tag is random, it is the reduction in tags that is the problem. If you want to compare bonus vs preference, all you have to do is look at the history of drawing certain elk tags in CO. Where once you needed 8, now you need 35-40.Point Creep is much worse in a Bonus Points system than a Preference Point one. Ask anyone in Washington. Preference Points are the best kind of points, and the only other viable option is Idaho's method.
Preference points are out of fashion because those on the bottom tier are paying for the management costs for decades while having zero opportunity at drawing a tag.Most people don't understand the math, but Bonus Point Systems are terrible. Point creep is ubiquitous across the West, but Bonus Point Systems exacerbate the problem. I am not going to take the time to show you the math, but it's real. Here's a brief summary from AI. View attachment 1069948
Worst idea ever. Study Nevada and see what it’s like drawing a tag there. Or Montana sheep. Terrible idea.Gotchya, thanks. I’m still hoping they move it to a lottery squared points draw.
Or drawing WA anything. I prefer preference points. At least you have hope of drawing a tag sometime in your life, maybe.Worst idea ever. Study Nevada and see what it’s like drawing a tag there. Or Montana sheep. Terrible idea.
chatGPT is the source?Most people don't understand the math, but Bonus Point Systems are terrible. Point creep is ubiquitous across the West, but Bonus Point Systems exacerbate the problem. I am not going to take the time to show you the math, but it's real. Here's a brief summary from AI. View attachment 1069948
You are convinced you are rite and won’t listen.chatGPT is the source?
Listen, you don’t insult a guy you don’t know anything about, that’s ignorant. Your math isn’t mathing up, and you’re both missing the point. The goal is to attract application dollars to fund resource management. If your sales pitch is “You have a zero chance of ever drawing a moose permit, but please give us your $150 point fee” is failure. But! “The more points you buy the greater your chance above zero is” has the ability to attract new money to keep this operation going. It’s such a successful rudimentary process I’m not sure why you’re struggling with it. I apply in all Western States and know the variations, some are better that others.You are convinced you are rite and won’t listen.
He used ChatGPT because he knows you won’t listen and typing a lengthy reply is a waste of time.
Then, only a few sentences later…..Listen, you don’t insult a guy you don’t know anything about, that’s ignorant.
It’s such a successful rudimentary process I’m not sure why you’re struggling with it.
Listen, you don’t insult a guy you don’t know anything about, that’s ignorant. Your math isn’t mathing up, and you’re both missing the point. The goal is to attract application dollars to fund resource management. If your sales pitch is “You have a zero chance of ever drawing a moose permit, but please give us your $150 point fee” is failure. But! “The more points you buy the greater your chance above zero is” has the ability to attract new money to keep this operation going. It’s such a successful rudimentary process I’m not sure why you’re struggling with it. I apply in all Western States and know the variations, some are better that others.