Would you rather...

Joined
Dec 7, 2019
Messages
918
Have a pair of lower end binoculars and a decent spotting scope, or a pair of higher end binoculars and no spotting scope?

Details... I currently have a pair of Leupold BX-1 10x42 as my only optic. I’m a flat lander doing a couple of DIY western hunts this fall, and have budgeted about $1,000 for optics this year. Need help deciding which route would be more useful for the terrain out west (I’m used to 300 yard max visibility here). Im considering either replacing my Leupolds with Maven C series or Leica Trinivoids 10x42 OR getting a decent spotting scope to use with my low end Leupold binoculars (Maven, Kowa, others?). If it matters, I’ll be going to Colorado for 3rd rifle elk, and Montana Elk B with a rifle. Also, general game spotting is more important to me than identifying trophy quality. Thanks for any input.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ZackP

WKR
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Messages
866
Location
Idaho
Are you going to your bino’s most of the time or your spotting scope? I’m behind bino’s 90% of the time.

Something to consider.
call Doug at Camera Land and get the Kowa Genesis on sale for $999.
 

OrangeMan73

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
159
My vote is for bushnell legend binocs and a Leica televid spotter. When you get out there you really want to get out there, but quick looksees don't require the definition. Probably weighs more but life's too short not to be able to see miles away...
 

OldGrayJB

WKR
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Messages
416
I'd take good binos and no spotter. IMO spotters are for judging trophy class. You could notice a huge difference by just upgrading to BX-4's.
 
OP
Bearwhisky
Joined
Dec 7, 2019
Messages
918
Thanks for all the responses. Binos seem to be the ticket! 8 or 10x seem the best for me here in the east, so I’m leaning towards a 10x for dual purpose. However, if 12 or 15x would put my lightyears ahead in the big mountains, I would consider those instead (seeing as the short distances I glass here don’t require as high quality glass). If anyone has strong opinions towards the higher power, I’m all ears. It seems to me that too much magnification on binos will make acquiring target harder, decrease FOV and be very unsteady when not on a tripod.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
2,956
Always binoculars as you’ll use it where as the spotter may get used a few minutes per day.

Get a good tripod and head. But you don’t have to break the bank on it.
 
Last edited:

Rifles And More

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
283
Location
Wyoming
If you are just trying to find animals - I'd do the binos and a tripod. Try and get the very best you can, maybe even a 12x. Stretch that budget a bit.

If you are looking for a certain class of animal - a spotter is the way to go. I'm afraid though, a 1K budget won't get you what you need to really judge size.
 

BBob

WKR
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
4,453
Location
Southern AZ
For your situation (CO elk) I'd lean to the best 8 or 10x you can afford first. Trinovid's were once one of the best binoculars to be had and certainly have found tons of game. Once you do a hunt or two and you think you need more magnification buy the best 15x and or a spotting scope you can afford down the road. You can do really well with quality 10x on your neck and tripod. For most elk hunts you won't need any more than the 8 or 10x and on lots of elk hunts you won't need a tripod or you can do without. A lot depends on what type of hunt you are doing and where it is exactly. A buddy has hunted CO elk way more than me and he doesn't take anything but 10x on his neck into the back country. No tripod ever and he kills pretty much every year for many years. He's an AZ Coues hunter and has high end 15's and spotter but has no need for them on those hunts.

As to how much I've used a good spotting scope on an elk hunt? I've been behind a scope for hours glassing for elk especially in big cedar country. It's a great tool to have when wanted/needed but certainly not required for most hunts. But I've found some whopper bulls way out there with my spotter so....
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
1,941
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Thanks for all the responses. Binos seem to be the ticket! 8 or 10x seem the best for me here in the east, so I’m leaning towards a 10x for dual purpose. However, if 12 or 15x would put my lightyears ahead in the big mountains, I would consider those instead (seeing as the short distances I glass here don’t require as high quality glass). If anyone has strong opinions towards the higher power, I’m all ears. It seems to me that too much magnification on binos will make acquiring target harder, decrease FOV and be very unsteady when not on a tripod.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I was only going to have one, 10x. If you plan on adding 15s down the road then I’d go 8x. 12s are just too much for me to hand hold personally.
 

6.5x284

WKR
Joined
May 7, 2015
Messages
1,062
Location
NW MT
Concur with most, best bino’s you can afford first followed by a tripod second. You will be amazed how far you can find animals with even 8x binos on a tripod! I’ve shown a lot of people animals they missed that I found on a tripod. Every one has bought a tripod as soon as they got home from our trip!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
834
Location
N. CO
I would focus my $ on the best 10x42 binos you can afford within your $1,000 budget. Maybe a set of Vortex Razors HD (a good used pair would be fine). For the type of hunting you will be doing it doesn't sound like a spotter would be that useful.
 

S.Clancy

WKR
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Messages
2,498
Location
Montana
I have Meopta 10x42 on a good tripod. I can reliably glass out to 1.5 - 2 miles with that setup, depending on deer vs elk. I can also generally tell if a buck or bull is worth a closer look at that range. 10x42 are best, in my opinion, from about 1/2 mile to 1 mile of a tripod. Not much need for a spotter unless super far distance or big time trophy hunting.
 
Top