Would you buy this scope?

I still want to know who is the poor soul who has to be the “love tapper”? At 5 min a scope (?) + breaks, 500 is already over a full weeks of work. I’d go mad.

I’m sure you’ll cut that down with a little assembly line going, but still… this does show a level of QC I was not expecting though. Especially at the price point.
 
From memory of posts. They wanted to get access to LOW, they got access to LOW and approached them about the subject scope with the adage of 4x erectors being more durable, good eyebox, etc. historically. LOW said "Hey we've made advances on 6x erector systems for both durability and optics, etc. Check out these details and we can make it durable, yadda yadda.". Lots more talk I am sure and fast forward to delivering this scope and it proving out.

The fact LOW already had an improved 6x erector design in the works is why this ended up being a 3-18x and on this timeline is my interpretation from the thread.

The smaller / lighter scope since referenced has been stated it would need to be designed from the ground up to meet the needs and that will take a couple years. Why can't they use the 6x errector? I would speculate its because it wouldn't hit the weight goal.

I have no inside knowledge, that is just my interpretation of the information posted here.
You think this has anything to do with the new NX6 lineup? I bet it does. MT demanded a durable 6x erector, and all a sudden it was available at LOW.
 
Back
Top