Would you buy this scope?

Meters not Metres. 'Merica! (Not really.) :ROFLMAO:

Reticle could grow on me with use. At first look, it looks "busy" without knowing all the reasons for each aspect of it. Could very well end up being my first Mil scope. Did it come in at 26-27 oz?
 
Meters not Metres. 'Merica! (Not really.) :ROFLMAO:

Reticle could grow on me with use. At first look, it looks "busy" without knowing all the reasons for each aspect of it. Could very well end up being my first Mil scope. Did it come in at 26-27 oz?
I sometimes try to type American spellings when on here so as to not freak you guys out ... but was using metres on purpose to see who would bite!

But seriously - for those who think this reticle is 'busy':
1. Read @THLR's post a few pages back about why many of the features disappear in use.
2. Read @Formidilosus review of the ZP5, where he confirms this is true.
3. Read the entire ZP5 review and the Q&A threads, study the reticle subtensions mark-up, and watch all of THLR's videos. Do it all over again.
4. Now come back and look at this version of the reticle ... it will appear incredibly simplified, intuitive, and functional.

And to prevent the peanut gallery 'Rokslide is a cult' comments, don't trust me ... do all of the above yourself and you'll feel like Neo in the Matrix.
 
I can see across the room just fine (and read street signs at 200+ yards).

It's generally close vision that deteriorates with age, so a turret (or a level) at 12" blurs for a lot of us. Find some over 50 types who don't wear glasses except for reading or close work and see what they see.
Yep. This is where the turret magnifiers from BagBullet and MKM are helpful.

BagBullet's are enclosed in metal and replace the top scope ring - pros are that it's robust and always there, and not an extra piece to be mucking around with; cons are that he only does/did them for certain rings (Seekins and was working on Sphur) ... and that last I looked on the Hide, he seemed to have dropped off.

I haven't looked at MKM's in person. From memory, though, they were an extra thing to bolt on, and 3D printed plastic.

Overall - handy things - I can adjust the diopter to my eye, and glace up and read the turrets, all without needing glasses. Gold.
 
I can see across the room just fine (and read street signs at 200+ yards).

It's generally close vision that deteriorates with age, so a turret (or a level) at 12" blurs for a lot of us. Find some over 50 types who don't wear glasses except for reading or close work and see what they see.
Yeah, Form..........what he said. So there.
 
Yep. This is where the turret magnifiers from BagBullet and MKM are helpful.

BagBullet's are enclosed in metal and replace the top scope ring - pros are that it's robust and always there, and not an extra piece to be mucking around with; cons are that he only does/did them for certain rings (Seekins and was working on Sphur) ... and that last I looked on the Hide, he seemed to have dropped off.

I haven't looked at MKM's in person. From memory, though, they were an extra thing to bolt on, and 3D printed plastic.

Overall - handy things - I can adjust the diopter to my eye, and glace up and read the turrets, all without needing glasses. Gold.
I am blind, so I use tape on the turrets. Tapetaccool.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4472.png
    IMG_4472.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 47
I think this is an excellent idea.

I've not been bothered by the 0.1 mil marks on the uber-tall SWFA turrets, but on a low profile turret they're awfully close to the numbers. If you don't actually get rid of them, please consider shortening them (perhaps to the point of being dots).

I dont understand the request? Like have no markings at all other than at half and whole mils?
 
So I’d Ryan & Form don’t care less about what the masses what, why start this thread?

Just make the damn scope in a vacuum and actually release a product on time and ready to go.
 
Back
Top