fwafwow
WKR
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
- Messages
- 6,296
So did they cover that in the podcast?It's amazing how many podcast you can listen to driving from Wisconsin to Colorado to New Mexico back to Colorado back to Wisconsin for a little hunting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So did they cover that in the podcast?It's amazing how many podcast you can listen to driving from Wisconsin to Colorado to New Mexico back to Colorado back to Wisconsin for a little hunting.
Sounds like the OG LRHS but with a higher upper magnification, that was a good scopeIf you have noticed, Form and I don't really care if the masses want it; if we want it, there are enough other people who will want it.
The scopes will be 3-18x44 sub 25oz and DURABLE. The reticle will be a hunting reticle, not a tacdafag reticle—low profile turrets with an elevation turret that stays put with a price tag that won't break the bank. The Maven has come the closest, but IMO, no scope has put this all together yet.
Better is subjective. Zoom range that can be found on many scopes, Price appears to be creeping up.For this scope, better reticle, better turrets, more zoom. Potentially better price point.
Everything is still speculation we havent seen the scope, just appreciative that a company is trying to give us what we want.Better is subjective. Zoom range that can be found on many scopes, Price appears to be creeping up.
Agreed, more options for consumers is a win. Especially by a company that understands this niche in the shooting market. If this scope is successful I'm sure there will be more to follow.Everything is still speculation we havent seen the scope, just appreciative that a company is trying to give us what we want.
Or 7x428x50 or 8x56...
If built and priced right, will quickly own the space.
Apparently its not hard look at you go.I guess it’s good you guys don’t care what the masses think but someone apparently does. How else did it go from a 3-12 sub 20 oz to another 3-18-44 with a cool reticle?
There are quite a few posts in this thread where people said they wanted more Xs than 12 and they all got told those scopes were already available.
It’s hard to complain about a new quality scope but this isnt what many were hoping for. Unless the price is very competitive it’s quickly losing appeal vs what’s already available on the new and used market.
All that would be great! I am just wondering what you can do to spec out a different manufacturing process to make the scope more reliable than say a Tract or Maven using the same internals
I am simply curious as to how, which would lead me to wonder why all the other brands that use Light Optics don't do it.
I guess it’s good you guys don’t care what the masses think but someone apparently does. How else did it go from a 3-12 sub 20 oz to another 3-18-44 with a cool reticle?
It’s hard to complain about a new quality scope but this isnt what many were hoping for. Unless the price is very competitive it’s quickly losing appeal vs what’s already available on the new and used market.
Its hard to keep track but how are they pushing the boundaries exactly? At this point, from what I have gathered, they are making Trijicon with a different reticle.
Looks like this still means around the $1,000 price point for an estimation- $600 to $700 less
How much elevation travel?
The Tenmile has less than 18 mils?
From memory, a few timeframes were mentioned: possibly mid next year, Fall next year, to this time next year. There are a lot of moving parts; no doubt, once it's a bit clearer Ryan will be able to give a tighter estimate.So did they cover that in the podcast?
I'm just repeating what Frank Galli has said multiple times on The Everyday Sniper.After doing a tiny bit of looking it does not appear that any Schott rifle scope glass is made in China.
Thank you. I wasn't complaining. I've not been the best at following this thread, and I stopped listening to the podcasts some time ago. Looking forward to seeing it, whenever it's ready. And I'm still long SWFAs and an RS1.2, so I'm g2g in the interim.From memory, a few timeframes were mentioned: possibly mid next year, Fall next year, to this time next year. There are a lot of moving parts; no doubt, once it's a bit clearer Ryan will be able to give a tighter estimate.
So: a bit of a wait, but a wait to get what many of us want. While a lot here don't like waiting, the flipside is that's what comes with being asked about concepts in advance, and being kept up to date with the realities of what it takes to get such a project realised.
And still the SWFAs and the RS1.2 in the meantime, so hopefully there's no whinging about the wait ...
Personally, I immensely dislike the Eagleman reticle and would prefer their Milrad reticle if I bought a Tract.Personally I love the Eagleman reticle.