Why Load Shelf?

chindits

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
745
Location
Westslope, CO
Yea I don’t get the load shelf or putting the meat between the pack and frame.

When I’m hunting I have some items in the bottom of my pack bag. This is usually rain gear and puffy jacket and pants, and food for the day. If I put the meat bag between the main pack and removable talon pack it rests above all the stuff in the main bag around my center of gravity. The main pack bag is another barrier against blood dripping down my back. The meat is still close to the frame as it just has two layers of pack fabric between it. Why would I bother disassembling my pack just to pack meat in the same position and orientation that I already do.

IMG_5955.jpegIMG_5955.jpeg
 

Jethro

WKR
Joined
Mar 2, 2014
Messages
1,382
Location
Pennsylvania
You meat in the bag guys, are you all deboning?

I'd never consider a frame with no shelf. This season I did a cow front and hind bone in. Laid the hind meat down knee bone sticking up. Loaded the front with meat/scapula up and elbow facing down. Nested together nicely and didn't have all the weight low on the shelf. Wasn't pleasant, but I think that configuration helped.
 

Geewhiz

WKR
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
2,557
Location
SW MT
Yea I don’t get the load shelf or putting the meat between the pack and frame.

When I’m hunting I have some items in the bottom of my pack bag. This is usually rain gear and puffy jacket and pants, and food for the day. If I put the meat bag between the main pack and removable talon pack it rests above all the stuff in the main bag around my center of gravity. The main pack bag is another barrier against blood dripping down my back. The meat is still close to the frame as it just has two layers of pack fabric between it. Why would I bother disassembling my pack just to pack meat in the same position and orientation that I already do.

View attachment 794593View attachment 794593
Moving the weight of that meat 6-10” closer to your back is going to make that load much more comfortable. Displacing the weight of a few lbs of clothing is a non issue.
 

chindits

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
745
Location
Westslope, CO
What 6-10 inches? Two layers of pack cloth isn’t even 6mm. That’s all the distance is from my meat bags to my frame. Now if you mean 6-10 inches from the bottom pack, I prefer having the weight higher towards my center of gravity.
 

chindits

WKR
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Messages
745
Location
Westslope, CO
Both. Boneless this year’s rifle and last year’s moose, Bone in archery bull. All depends on how much time I have on the kill site with the day’s temperatures.
 
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
1,325
Location
Bozeman, MT
I've tried the meat shelf and personally hate it. Most allow the meat to sag too much in my opinion and blood still gets on the pack if you don't bag it, though it is all on the outside this way. I prefer to keep the meat a little higher and for me its easier to secure it inside the bag with all of my day gear or camp gear in the bottom to elevate the meat. I always line my pack with a contractor trash bag and have never had an issue with leakage. I always carry a largish pack bag even on day hunts. The extra 1/2 pound of material is negligible for me as it allows me one do all bag. That is just my experience, though obviously some people love them because they are pretty popular.

2nd this. But the meat shelf is nice to have as an option, just in case I need crazy volume on a backpack style hunt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
9,669
The meat is the same volume in the bag or outside it so does it really push the bag out further if it's all pulled against the frame with the same compression straps either way?

Keeping all my shit from getting soaked in blood is desirable. Having the weight close to your back is nice.
 
Last edited:

Geewhiz

WKR
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
2,557
Location
SW MT
Whaaaaat!?!?! 🤔
Yeah, I can't believe you didn't know it was the side of the pack enveloping around the meat bag. :ROFLMAO:

Looks to me like the pack is full of junk and he just strapped a few lbs of meat in a bag onto the back of his pack. But if it doesn't bother him then it doesn't bother me.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
2,690
I prefer meat on the shelf. Your pack stays cleaner and the meat load is more secure. I would rather have my extra clothes and such pushed out a little if it means I can keep the heavy stuff closest to my body.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
1,100
I prefer meat on the shelf. Your pack stays cleaner and the meat load is more secure. I would rather have my extra clothes and such pushed out a little if it means I can keep the heavy stuff closest to my body.
agreed

an exo with the crib panel simply can not be beat in my opinion
 

hikenhunt

WKR
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
463
Location
WA
The load shelf provides versatility for me. I don't need 3 different pack sizes for different lengths of hunts. I got the medium pack and can use the load shelf for more capacity on longer treks if needed. If used for meat, meat weighs a lot more than my camp, so keeping that on the frame is ideal. Keeping the inside of the bag clean is a bonus but not a main reason for me.
 

100%DIYazCOUES

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
139
I don’t get this “ only difference is the thickness of the pack” argument either. You just simply get the meat higher and tighter to the frame with a good load shelf. you don’t goo everything up, and you retain your full pack capacity with a load of meat( or anything else….i had 3 gallons of water on the shelf heading into my hunt a couple weeks ago).I hunted a long time putting meat in the bag, it works, but I haven’t heard or come up with a single argument why it’s not the better way to pack meat…. It just is.
 

prm

WKR
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
2,240
Location
No. VA
Meat shelf for me. My day hunt gear stays in the bag and meat is easily loaded and placed close to my back.
 
Top