Regardless of anyone’s claim in either direction, if you can show your work it cuts thru all arguments and theory. Rather than talk about it and make claims, I think everyone here should actually try it and show results. Timed circle drill at 100 yards done twice with similar-weight and configuration hunting rifles, one with sub-10ft/lb recoil, and one more than 20ft/lb recoil. Shoot the drill a couple times so the excercise itself isnt “cold” , repeat, then compare scores. I challenge anyone here to show they can consistently equal their little gun scores with a heavier recoiling gun. Remember, time counts. THIS^^ is the claim when people say its harder to shoot a bigger recoiling gun. It includes follow up shots and it assumes a time-limit and it assumes getting into multiple positions on the clock.
The drill: target has 4 separate circles on it, 7moa, 5moa, 3moa and 2moa. Each circle is shot twice for string of fire 1 and 2, and once for #3. Each “drill” is shot on the same target sheet in 3 strings of fire. Every target circle starts standing with all of your gear carried/stowed exactly as you walk around while hunting—ie pack on, empty chamber, etc if thats how you hunt. String 1 has no time limit. String 2 is the same, but each pair of shots has a 20-second time limit. String 3 is one timed medley of 1 shot at each position/target in 60 seconds. I do the drill in this order:
7MOA circle = 2 shots offhand
5MOA circle = 2 shots sitting unsupported
3MOA = 2 shots sitting or keeling with sticks or backpack
2MOA = 2 shots prone
(All 1 shot in the third string)
A hit in the correct circle is 1 point. Outside the circle its 0. The score for a drill is your number of hits, with a max of 20 points.
View attachment 1079030