General RE LEE
WKR
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2019
- Messages
- 2,624
This has been a very interesting and informative thread. I have the exact same questions as @JDZ
I too am curious about any real disadvantages to this scope. It seems that there are good, analog solutions to electronic failure in the field (MOA reticle, turret graduations). I’d sure like to hear from anyone whose personal experience disagrees.
I think that the quantity of these ads for a recently released product is the reason for the question. It definitely raised my eyebrows… but my guess is that folks (understandably) didn’t like dealing with the interface or experienced the rapid battery drain issues. It also appears that many were the first gen version.
Might just have to pull the trigger and find out for myself
Gunmag warehouse has the 3-15 on sale for $800… waiting for the 4-20 to come back in stock to see pricing
I will say this scope is not for everyone. In order to get the most out of the scope, one will need to either have a chronograph or a place to shoot long range to verify drops. Also, it requires accurate information regarding density altitude and bore to scope height.
Folks that are proficient using ballistic calculator apps and have a place to shoot long range will do well with the scope. Folks that are simply uploading the velocity printed on the box of factory ammo and hoping they are going to be on at 400 yards are going to be disappointed.