AustinL911
Lil-Rokslider
- Joined
- May 24, 2016
- Messages
- 291
Those tires look like a bitch to get rolling. Maybe they're lighter than they look, but they don't look like they'd be much fun to pedal up a hill.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those tires look like a bitch to get rolling. Maybe they're lighter than they look, but they don't look like they'd be much fun to pedal up a hill.
Awesome video, poor dog.
Need one of these bikes for sure, just wonder how hard it would be to pack a caribou out on one.
Those tires look like a bitch to get rolling. Maybe they're lighter than they look, but they don't look like they'd be much fun to pedal up a hill.

They aren't as bad as one would think, they are heavier but it's all a matter of context. We do a lot of gravel riding and racing and with the sandy roads that we have, a lot of us have switched from cyclocross bikes to fats. It's not hard to average 14-16 mph over a few hour ride. A lot smoother ride too.Those tires look like a bitch to get rolling. Maybe they're lighter than they look, but they don't look like they'd be much fun to pedal up a hill.

Another option if you're not wanting to go the full fat bike route is 27.5+. The + is for the tire width as most of these bikes are running 2.8-3.0 inch wide tires. These are becoming more and more popular, especially because most of these frames will also let you run a standard 29er wheelset too.
I recently picked up a new Salsa Timberjack (the 27.5+ version) for bikepacking/hunting and so far am really impressed with it.
If you're getting one for packing/hunting, you definitely want a relaxed, upright frame geometry as opposed to an aggressive design. Being upright allows you to comfortably wear a pack with a little bit of weight in it.