White Cloud Outfitters

[Mike 338]

Don't know anything about the case or these people involved. I can tell you that reading the Regs, does anyone understand just where boundaries are?

 

[Johnnybobcat]

Trial for men accused of outfitter violations pushed to August

The trial for two Challis men accused of multiple violations connected to guided big game hunts has again been rescheduled.

www.idahopress.com

I sure had no idea you could extend trials this many times. Especially for a federal indictment

 

[Johnnybobcat]

Don't know anything about the case or this people involved. I can tell you that reading the Regs, does anyone understand just where boundaries are?

It can definitely be challenging, I’ve saw one controlled hunt boundary description that about gave me a stroke when I tried comparing it’s description to a map. An outfitter should know his boundaries inside and out though. That being said, I also dont know entirely what these twos situation entailed.

 

[westernarcher]

Sounds like they know their boundaries because they ask permission, are denied permission and do the hunt anyways. Then omit reporting that activity to the forest service.

 

[sneaky]

It can definitely be challenging, I’ve saw one controlled hunt boundary description that about gave me a stroke when I tried comparing it’s description to a map. An outfitter should know his boundaries inside and out though. That being said, I also dont know entirely what these twos situation entailed.

They were hunting in an area that is completely off limits to outfitters. They knew it, and went anyway. This isn't a case of not knowing rules or regulations. They knew they weren't supposed to be there and went anyways. They also think they own all of the elk in their outfitting area. Real pieces of work.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

 

[Johnnybobcat]

They were hunting in an area that is completely off limits to outfitters. They knew it, and went anyway. This isn't a case of not knowing rules or regulations. They knew they weren't supposed to be there and went anyways. They also think they own all of the elk in their outfitting area. Real pieces of work.

Sent from my SM-S918U using Tapatalk

Yeah that’s what I’ve gathered from the articles. I left my blurb on the end just cuz I keep reading a few locals post about how there’s more to the story, these are stand up guys etc etc. I have also had some positive experiences chatting with Farr while I’m out hunting, and he helped me with a flat tire once in the summer. I’ve been anxious to see the hearing. Even With all the extra local stuff and my own experience tho, its hard to overlook the evidence. definitely seems pretty cut and dry. They knowingly broke the law and on more than one occasion.