- Thread Starter
- #61
TERMINATOR
FNG
Thank you.Good luck with your hunt.
You overlooked some great private land opportunities .
And you are dead wrong on the 90/10 split and how it would affect our local economies.
I didn't "overlook" them. I just decided against them and not because I didn't feel they would give me a high quality hunt.
Most of the top "Big Buck" private land outfitters I talked to needed more points than I have now and/or would have im 2023/2024. And if you guys get your way and 90/10 happens the NR Point cost will double and I will never get there so I am taking what I can get with the points I have.
I also have done some private land ranch hunts via 4x4 in Wyoming, had a great time, shot some good bucks and am kind of excited about doing a horse based hunt even though I realize on public land we could run into competition. But Tre's track record suggest we can still be successful.
As far as me being dead wrong....that is kind of hard to prove one way or the other but if the Senators in the Travel, Recreation and Wildlife committee and everyone else believed that...it would have sailed through the the committee 5-0 instead of getting shot down 1-4, been voted on and passed in the legislature and signed by the Governor by now.
Maybe someday you guys will get your wish and 90/10 passes. Then you can find out if all the NRs will just say "OK" and keep applying and buying points. Personally I am burning my Elk, Deer and Antelope points and won't buy any more points if the NR point cost has soared above what it has been. It wont make any sense to if I won't be able to get enough points in the remainder of my hunting lifetime to use them.
The good news is that maybe your dreams will come true, the outfitters will go out of business and won't be able to lease ranches so all will be Nirvana in Wyoming other than the WF&G losing lots of funding and some outfitters losing their way of making a living.
Last edited: