Luke S
WKR
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2019
- Messages
- 336
I got to thinking the other day about the old idea that iron sites are faster than a scope for close up dangerous game (bears erc). I think we all agree that a red dot or LPVO is faster/better than iron sites.
But what about scopes that are more traditional, say 2x or 3x on the low end? What is the cut-off where you are better off pulling the scope off and using iron sites? In the old days I get that a fixed 4x or 6x scope might be pretty limiting. But my Trijicon on 2.5x seems faster than irons.
Has anyone tested this?
But what about scopes that are more traditional, say 2x or 3x on the low end? What is the cut-off where you are better off pulling the scope off and using iron sites? In the old days I get that a fixed 4x or 6x scope might be pretty limiting. But my Trijicon on 2.5x seems faster than irons.
Has anyone tested this?