Coveyleader
WKR
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2013
Is the OP shooting 60lbs @ 27 inches, or 60lbs @ 31inches? Big difference in trajectory no matter what grain arrow is shot.
Is the OP shooting 60lbs @ 27 inches, or 60lbs @ 31inches? Big difference in trajectory no matter what grain arrow is shot.
This is a pretty simple question. Sorry you got lambasted with posts telling you what they think. You should do instead of just an answer to your question.Any suggestions on what lighter gpi arrow for a 60lb compound? I currently shoot fmj but I'm looking for a lighter arrow for trajectory Thanks
You’d be well served to forget about KE and focus on momentum. Energy (at archery levels) does not kill animals. Destroying vital tissue does. So focus on what gets arrows into and through vital organs.Mate,
At no point did I (or anyone) mention a faster arrow beats the speed of sound. We are purely talking about forgiveness in trajectory.
If a 450gn arrow from a 45# recurve bow is plenty to kill animals, then a 400-450gn arrow from a 60# arrow is plenty to kill animals as well.
I'm not on the super lightweight brigade here, trying to tell someone to shoot a 350gn arrow for hunting. I think 400-450gn for a 60# compound is quite reasonable.
For argument's sake, I've killed animals with a 48# recurve and a 500gn arrow, doing 170fps. That's about 32ft lb of kinetic energy, and 0.377 of momentum. Anyone who hunts with traditional equipment would say that's more than enough to kill most medium sized game (deer, goats, pigs, etc).
If you can have a 420gn arrow out of a 60# compound doing roughly 265fps, that's 65ft lb of kinetic energy, and 0.49 of momentum. A 475gn arrow would be doing about 245fps, which would have 63ft lb of kinetic energy (less) but slightly more momentum at 0.51.
My point is, using a standard 3 pin sight would see much easier pin gaps to work with if you have them marked 20/30/40m at 265fps, than 245fps.
In other words, the slight drop in ft lbs of energy, and the slightly rise in momentum, when going with a heavier arrow, is not a big enough trade off for me, when I could shoot a slightly lighter arrow with a little more ft lbs of energy, slightly less momentum, but an extra 20fps to bring my pin gaps closer together.
I'm not normally one to split hairs this much but I've just got back into the compound stuff in the last 12 months and I'm really enjoying the forgiveness in trajectory and range estimation that comes in this space.
So to the OP, you'll kill animals very easily with a 60# compound bow, but the difference in penetration between a 400-475gn arrow will be negligible. If you choose a good broadhead (as mentioned before) you'll be fine, but a little extra speed for estimating trajectory is never a bad thing, unless your arrow is so light it doesn't carry enough energy to penetrate anything properly.
You’d be well served to forget about KE and focus on momentum. Energy (at archery levels) does not kill animals. Destroying vital tissue does. So focus on what gets arrows into and through vital organs.
My recommendation would be Axis in the same spine range. It won’t save you a lot of weight, but I personally wouldn’t want to go below 400 grs.Any suggestions on what lighter gpi arrow for a 60lb compound? I currently shoot fmj but I'm looking for a lighter arrow for trajectory Thanks
Easton Sonic or Gold Tip Force FOC would be solid options. If you do want to go small diameter then the Easton Axis or Victory RIP TKO are also good but much more expensive.Any suggestions on what lighter gpi arrow for a 60lb compound? I currently shoot fmj but I'm looking for a lighter arrow for trajectory Thanks
Of course there is a point of diminishing returns with arrow weight. But seeking out lighter and faster arrows in an attempt to make up for possible animal movement in between release and impact is a complete misunderstanding of the factors at work when shooting an arrow at a wild animal. You are only creating a more serious problem than the one you are trying to solve
Trajectory is not a "non issue". There is a lot to be said for shooting a flatter trajectory arrow/higher speed arrow. The three biggest are: Less time for wind drift. Flatter flight makes low branches easier to manage. Smaller pin gaps make gap shooting more accurate. There are a ton of folks in the hunting/TAC world that are going away from traditional heavy arrows to smaller diameter, lighter arrows. You should give it a try. I bet you'd be amazed.Less poundage should mean greater arrow weight, not less. You have a rangefinder, right? Trajectory is a non issue. This isn’t unmarked 3d.
Uhh, no.Trajectory is not a "non issue". There is a lot to be said for shooting a flatter trajectory arrow/higher speed arrow. The three biggest are: Less time for wind drift. Flatter flight makes low branches easier to manage. Smaller pin gaps make gap shooting more accurate. There are a ton of folks in the hunting/TAC world that are going away from traditional heavy arrows to smaller diameter, lighter arrows. You should give it a try. I bet you'd be amazed.
Then don't but at the same time if you unwilling to try things or try them again then your "exp" is very limited and you should let people that actually test things against there belief do the commenting.Uhh, no.
That's ke....more ke = harder to stop, it's literally a calculation based of speed and weight, how do you figure out momentum??You’d be well served to forget about KE and focus on momentum. Energy (at archery levels) does not kill animals. Destroying vital tissue does. So focus on what gets arrows into and through vital organs.