What is the best value in used high end binos right now ($1000+)?

[gooberfish]

What is the difference between Zeiss SF and SFL.

SF is slightly sharper, wider FOV, better edge to edge clarity. The SFL has the advantage with size and weight (the 40mm SFL is about the same size as the 32mm SF and they're within ~1 ounce of each other). Some people say the SF has a cool tint and that the SFL is ever so slightly better for color neutrality, but I can't say it's anything that has ever bothered me (or that I've ever noticed) on my SF 8x42s.

The SFs are way more ergonomic than two barely shaped tubes have any right to be, and even with the weight and size penalties I can use them handheld for hours at a time without my arms getting tired. They're also one of the only binoculars I've used that don't give me the rolling ball effect if that's something you're sensitive to. I probably sound like an ad at this point, and as others have said everyone's eyes will be different so test before buying, but they really are that good.

 

[Captains1911]

Sorry for the dumb question, but what exactly qualifies as “alpha?” I understand in general that it refers to high end, but is it subjective or is there some sort of criteria?

 

[4th_point]

Sorry for the dumb question, but what exactly qualifies as “alpha?” I understand in general that it refers to high end, but is it subjective or is there some sort of criteria?

Most people I know would just say Swaro, Leica, Zeiss - their top models. Overall image quality, but not necessarily the best for all criteria, all in one.

 

[Spiral Horn]

The title “Alpha” in terms of binoculars has been around for quite some time. It traditionally meant those brands/models with their own in-house manufacturing operation producing product lines offering consistent optical excellence, exceptional build quality and the best materials, as well as durability. These were often synonymous with trend-setting design. To a lesser degree this also considered brand prestige. This usually meant premium models from Leica and Zeiss as they were the first to offer “phase corrected” premium roof-prism designs combined with the best glass. Later, Swarovski joined the club. Some also consider the Nikon EDG an Alpha.

Now, decades later the moniker “Alpha” still has some prestige but nowhere near what it used to. Others have been able to develop very good optical designs and Zeiss and Ohara make their glass widely available. The explosion of OEM manufacture make it possible for just about anyone to contract Kamakura/LOW to build a high quality optic that they market under a unique name.

Still today, the premium models of Zeiss, Swarovski and Leica bow to nobody for their optical excellence, materials/component/build quality and durability. Although the mid grades have closed ground the true “Alphas” still offer a bit more highly refined optical device.

I posted the above to the same - What is an “Alpha?” question a few years ago. A smidge better resolution, a smidge better CA control, a smidge deeper natural color saturation, a smidge better balance-focuser-skin feel, a smidge easier overall view with less eye fatigue = all of those smidges add up to a more deeply satisfying optical viewing experience. In essence, the best of the best.