- Thread Starter
- #21
Thank you
This is what I discovered earlier this year and it really helps to initially do comparisons with some strong colors and high contrast areas to make differences stand out. Once you see it, it's hard not to notice any more....there IS a difference between them, whether you can see it or not. The longer you spend behind them, the more you’ll see the difference.
Swarovski SLC’s other than the 15x56’s have been discontinued for over two years now.
Supposedly, the Kahles Helia S 42’s are the same binocular.
Also, Rokslide post on Swarovski SLC’s being discontinued from December 2021:
https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/swarovski-slc-kahles-helia-s.246128/
True, but u can find em on the used market. I hear the Kowa Genesis are also basically the SLCs. But the Helia's certainly look like the SLCs and they're Kahles which is owned by Swaro.
I'm just saying for the $1500 range of binos, Swaro SLCs many consider are the best.
True, but you can get used Vortex Razor UHD’s for less than $1,000 too.
Agreed. I bought my refurbished UHD's for 1K from AA Optics. They were 100% new. No reason to pay more. I have many binoculars and firmly believe the UHD's are ranked among the finest in the world optically.I would only buy the Razor UHD used or refurbed. Full retail price, they are more than good used Swaro, Leica, Zeiss, Meopta
Now I don’t have UHD. I do own Razors, SLCs, and b1.1 Meoptas. The 2 euros are head and shoulders above the Razor HD. Sometimes it’s hard to tell side by side. In actual hunting use the SLC just seem to give me more info. And I can see into the future with the Meopta 15s
That answer varies by user though and Zeiss, Leica, Meopta and even a handful of others all have their supporters, very often with the equation being based not only on the brand, but changing with various magnifications and model lines.Sounds like Swarovski still on top