This disclaimer is reasonable. However in other threads it seemed like you were insinuating that suppressor companies should not even post numbers this low because clearly something is wrong with the metering and it's misleading.
I understand in this context what you are saying, but it's still very close to what you were objecting to others doing.
No it isn’t. There is “possible”, and “not possible”. “There is also “possible, but unlikely, and needs more testing”.
Maybe a separate test and post demonstrating this "noise floor" effect with supersonic cartridges would be helpful to illustrate your point.
Understood, same as above.
I also found the initial response to this question to be emotional and easily construed as offensive. Apparently there is bad blood from other interactions I never knew about, but it came off as strangely defensive to me.
Well, there are a small handful of poster whose sole purpose seems to be inflammatory, deceptive, trolling, or to outright lie.
At the end of the day Form, you have to understand that you are no longer perceived as impartial. I won't posit any theories or claims that you are getting compensated for any of your work with UM, US, S2H, etc, since those are often vehemently refuted and frankly it doesn't really matter. What matters is the PERCEPTION of you MARKETING products through your particular brand of extreme, UNBIASED testing.
Hmmm. Can you show me “marketing” products?
Recently you have a real knack for gushing about products that you are involved in the development of
“Gushing”
Please show an example of that. You have stated something, just like a couple of others- will you actually show examples of what you claim?
I told more people to not buy US suppressors than I have to buy them- because I don’t believe I’ve suggested a single person to buy them on here.
I told more people to not buy the S2H scope than I have to buy it- because I don’t believe I’ve suggested a single person to buy it on here.
I told more people to not buy the Rokstok than I have to buy it- because I don’t believe I’ve suggested a single person to buy it on here.
I told more people to not buy the Teratorn than I have to buy it- because I don’t believe I’ve suggested a single person to buy it on here.
What exactly have I “gushed” about in regards to products that you believe I have a hand in?
It never ends- first I was paid for by SWFA, then I was paid by NF, then I was paid by Tikka, then I was paid by Shane Megan, then I was paid by Stone Glacier, then I was paid by Revic, then Stockys, then Maven, etc, etc, etc.
and attacking and dragging products from competitors in those same domains. Packs, stocks, scopes, bullets, suppressors, rifles, etc.
What do you want to bet that I had the same complaints years ago, that I do now- and that those complaints or comments are on here?
If you think I am “attacking and dragging” products now- don’t go look at what I used to post. You joined in 2023- I have been here over a decade showing and saying exactly the same things.
Maybe it's just because the products you work on are better. OR maybe it's because you have an interest, whether monetary, pride, or whatever, in seeing those products succeed.
Here I’ll make this blunt and clear: I don’t give a shit about the products selling. Buy them, don’t buy them- I do not care.
I have stated repeatedly that you get the industry you deserve. I want products to be durable, reliable, and correct. I want products that I want to use.
I choose to believe it's the former, but I think you would benefit from making more effort to dispel notions that it's the latter.
And how would I do that exactly?