OsoMountain
FNG
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2025
- Messages
- 47
I’ve always thought it a bit stupid that someone could “own” land.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had a guy walk into my land, right past two No Trespassing signs and caught him on multiple trail cams. Obvious shed hunter. I posted on Facebook to see if anyone knew him (mostly just so someone that does will share it with him and let him know he's a documented jack@ss)...I’ve always thought it a bit stupid that someone could “own” land.
I said I thought it was stupid, not that I didn’t abide by it. Monumental difference.I had a guy walk into my land, right past two No Trespassing signs and caught him on multiple trail cams. Obvious shed hunter. I posted on Facebook to see if anyone knew him (mostly just so someone that does will share it with him and let him know he's a documented jack@ss)...
I was blown away that half the comments were people like you that seemingly did not agree with the concept of private property when it comes to land. None would offer their home address to invite anyone in though. Eye opening to hear some of the rationale that people use to justify trespassing while hunting (poaching).
Had a guy offer me a 100 bill one time. I didn't take the money.Whips out the checkbook, and asks "How much is this going to cost to make it go away?"
“How much for your dignity and integrity. Shoot me a number.”Had a guy offer me a 100 bill one time. I didn't take the money.
What were the neighbors pissed about??? That situation didn't involve them at all.The trespasser whipped out $800, paid the landowner and left with his bull and no criminal charges. Neighboring landowners were pissed at the situation
I agree. Seems to me like the situation resolved itself between the parties involved. Why would anyone else be upset?What were the neighbors pissed about??? That situation didn't involve them at all.
Yes.Doesn't the definition of extortion fit this scenario?
Mainly that a very new to the area landowner took the money instead of prosecuting the guy and having him face actual consequences for his actionsWhat were the neighbors pissed about??? That situation didn't involve them at all.
You never owned it to begin with. Now be a good boy and pay your property taxes so Uncle Sam doesn’t take it away from you.Trespassing is the damage. You are interfering with and damaging my property rights when you enter my property without permission. If you can walk all over my land as long as you don't do any other damage, then you have diminished my right to quiet enjoyment of my property. If I cannot exclude people from my property, then I don't really own it.
In American law, we think of property rights as a "bundle of sticks." The five main sticks are typically identified as:
Possession: The right to occupy the property.
Control: The right to use or alter the property within legal limits.
Exclusion: The right to prevent others from entering or using the property.
Enjoyment: The right to use the property in any legal manner.
Disposition: The right to sell, will, or transfer ownership.
You never owned it to begin with. Now be a good boy and pay your property taxes so Uncle Sam doesn’t take it away from you.
Funny, I never mentioned what level of government?There’s no federal property tax. Only a state one.
All ownership is predicated on having force to defend your rights. In this case, we, as a society, have decided that having the state enforce those rights beats having to defend them against all comers. I’ve been to enough places without the rule of law, thank you very much. Respect for property rights is a fundamental basis for a free society.
Funny, I never mentioned what level of government?
Maybe it’s my general hatred for this dog shit society?
Of course! Why didn’t I think of leaving?!