Tract Toric UltraHD 3-15x50mm Q&A

[Formidilosus]

This is the Q&A for the Tract Toric Ultra HD scope.

Eval here

 

[woods89]

Another one bites the dust......

The member who sent it in deserves some thanks, as well as all involved in testing!

 

[checkrog]

Dang... I was going to get one in 2-10x42 for my next rifle, due to the weight and nice BDC reticle.
Does a scope even exists thats sub 20oz, useable BDC, and doesn't fall apart with real field use?

 

[Trogon]

I’d say this counts as a “missing rifle scope feature”

 

[sndmn11]

I’d say this counts as a “missing rifle scope feature”

Too soon

 

[Billy Goat]

Another one bites the dust......

The member who sent it in deserves some thanks, as well as all involved in testing!

Where is the Meme Master??

 

[ljalberta]

Not very confidence instilling, from the performance, to the recommended rings, and a published video with incorrect torque specs.

These evaluations continue to remain the best thing that’s come to this forum in years (slightly edging out memes).

 

[wind gypsy]

A rifle scope manufacturer selling vertical rings in the first place raises questions but providing poor instruction on installation too?

 

[ResearchinStuff]

A rifle scope manufacturer selling vertical rings in the first place raises questions but providing poor instruction on installation too?

Really makes you wonder about their overall level of knowledge.

 

[ResearchinStuff]

The warne vertical split rings I briefly had tightened the base and the scope simultaneously on the bottom screws.

 

[ndlawrence]

The warne vertical split rings I briefly had tightened the base and the scope simultaneously on the bottom screws.

By design.

 

[SDHNTR]

Where did our Tract guy go? Am I the only one who would love to hear his thoughts on these results?

Fella sure was active in asking what features we wanted in a scope, yet is curiously quiet about this evaluation.

 

[Svivian]

Where did our Tract guy go? Am I the only one who would love to hear his thoughts on these results?

Fella sure was active in asking what features we wanted in a scope, yet is curiously quiet about this evaluation.

@JW@TRACT

There you go

 

[gbflyer]

Another great evaluation.

I used to score quite a bit of short range benchrest. That experience would prompt a call to see the backer from the target on post 3 dated 11-19 on the eval thread shot with the NF. A 2 in 1 that perfect is really rare. Might look different off a screen though.

 

[SDHNTR]

So we just got a bunch of likes from JW@TRACT, but no actual response or comments about the test on their scope? Hmmmmm

 

[fwafwow]

So we just got a bunch of likes, but no actual response or comments about the test? Hmmmmm

I haven’t watched the prior evaluations in real time or close to it. Did the others have responses or comments?

 

[SDHNTR]

I haven’t watched the prior evaluations in real time or close to it. Did the others have responses or comments?

I meant the Tract guy. I wouldn’t expect him to comment on other scope tests, but I certainly would expect some comments on the scope from his own company! Especially after he obviously saw the request and marked it with a like. And I haven’t seen any comments from other manufacturers as they don’t seem brave enough or dumb enough to be members here, touting their wares. Tract deserves some credit for showing up.

 

[Sled]

I really do like tract and will support them when they get their reliability worked out. Their hunting line is light enough and dials well for me. It has held zero in small inadvertent drops that put down other scopes I've had. If they could even pass the first part of form's test I'd be happy.

 

[gbflyer]

I don’t blame him for keeping quiet. What good could possibly come from what would inevitably turn into a weenie roast with folks on the ‘net? Hopefully they are in the laboratory taking a look at the results and learning what they can do to make a product that hunters will buy and continue to trust. Never know, they could be the ones to check all the boxes one of these days.

 

[bhylton]

I dont blame them either. I would be DMing the tester waaaayyyy before I would be getting into the comment section.