Erussell01
WKR
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2022
- Messages
- 1,258
Tinkering away and broadhead tuning this weekend and I found myself in a bit of a bind. Where my new rest tuned out perfectly, my qad exodus broadheads were close close to my riser. I mean like cat whisker close. Too close for comfort, so I started playing and I have a little fudge factor where I can have my spine alingment marker in the 11 oclock to 1 oclock position and still get perfect broadhead flight, but then if I'm not careful I'll be at risk of either fletching contact with cables (aae hybrid hp) or my broadhead blade coming into contact with either my riser or the arrow holder on the shelf. I was able to correct the issue by actually taking my 12 hunting arrows and fletching them all cock vane on the indicator, then reinstalling the 50 grain easton stainless half out so the broadhead aligns perfectly when cinched down tight. This solved the problem and I got my broadheads drilling with my field points to 80 yards.
Happy with the performance, but this got me thinking.
I threw on an old faithful micro hades 4 blade and I had 0 worries about fletching or blade orientation and I found that they were forgiving enough due to their small size to make no difference where I had the spine alignment positioned.
Then I started looking at holes in the target from broadheads and it made me start to wonder more-
Do you guys find better performance on game from a larger cut diameter, or with more blades and a larger total cut?
Basically since I have to be cautious with the exodus heads, it makes me wonder if the potential blood letting and wound opening properties of a broadhead work more from the circumference or the linear measurement of each blade combined.
I typically use mechanicals on whitetails, but I always broadhead tune my bow every season and make sure I can shoot the fixed blades I could hunt with so I always have options. In this case, I always gravitate towards larger fixed blades but the micro hades just fly too good too ignore. Even though they're really loud, I have had good luck with them in the past, but never honestly killed much with them due to always using bigger heads.
So- what is your take on this?
If a head has 4 blades, and a 1 1/16 total cut, for a grand total of 2.13 inches of total cut according to Grim reaper, would that technically leave as much of a hole (and therefore potential blood letting) as a 3 blade 1 1/4 like the exodus?
Happy with the performance, but this got me thinking.
I threw on an old faithful micro hades 4 blade and I had 0 worries about fletching or blade orientation and I found that they were forgiving enough due to their small size to make no difference where I had the spine alignment positioned.
Then I started looking at holes in the target from broadheads and it made me start to wonder more-
Do you guys find better performance on game from a larger cut diameter, or with more blades and a larger total cut?
Basically since I have to be cautious with the exodus heads, it makes me wonder if the potential blood letting and wound opening properties of a broadhead work more from the circumference or the linear measurement of each blade combined.
I typically use mechanicals on whitetails, but I always broadhead tune my bow every season and make sure I can shoot the fixed blades I could hunt with so I always have options. In this case, I always gravitate towards larger fixed blades but the micro hades just fly too good too ignore. Even though they're really loud, I have had good luck with them in the past, but never honestly killed much with them due to always using bigger heads.
So- what is your take on this?
If a head has 4 blades, and a 1 1/16 total cut, for a grand total of 2.13 inches of total cut according to Grim reaper, would that technically leave as much of a hole (and therefore potential blood letting) as a 3 blade 1 1/4 like the exodus?