Top Rut

[Scoot]

575- that's what I have reverted to. What they have is worthless. Except... it's not because I paid for it. I'm very pissed I paid for something I'm not getting. ... and now is when I need it. OnX- you should be giving full or partial refunds to past users this coming year given were not getting what we paid for.

 

[575 ELK]

575- that's what I have reverted to. What they have is worthless. Except... it's not because I paid for it. I'm very pissed I paid for something I'm not getting. ... and now is when I need it. OnX- you should be giving full or partial refunds to past users this coming year given were not getting what we paid for.

I was just about to buy onX elite for Top Rut then I started hearing all the negative talk about it. Checked out a friend who has it and I’m glad I didn’t wast my money thinking I was going to get the original Top Rut. R.I.P. TR.

 

[Huntnnw]

Another issue I found was I was looking at muzzleloader units in UT for deer and it was listing the same units over and over again ...you could scroll for minutes to just get to the end of the list.

 

[onX Hunt]

Thanks for the additional comments here, everyone. We are constantly improving this product and hope to make it better and better as we go. We have had table view from the start of this product, but from feedback, we've realized it's not easy to find, or even know it exists, so we are making that more prominent and we have some upcoming updates to make table view even more simple and more like the Toprut spreadsheet model many have commented they thought was easier to use.

As for the frustrations about multiple results for the same tags that have multiple units, we broke those out because there is unit-specific information we wanted to expose, like land area and in states that report harvest rate by unit (vs by hunt code) we wanted users to be able to see those nuances, so even if you get a tag that's valid in multiple units you can do deeper research to determine where specifically you want to plan to hunt within the units valid for a single tag. We hear you that this may cause some confusion and more scrolling and we're thinking about how we could simplify this while still exposing those core differences between units as well.

Thanks again for this feedback and please reach out personally if you need anything or would like to discuss in more detail.

Paul Ronto ([email protected]) - onX Hunt Product Manager

 

[Elkoholic87]

It would be helpful if the tags that are allocated for a specific unit, show the exact amount that go to residents and non-residents. For residents, it shows the total tags in that unit and then the amount that go to NRs. It throws the total amount of tags off and doesn’t decipher between both resident and NR tag amounts accurately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk