ColoradoV
WKR
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2013
- Messages
- 557
Just wanted to say some of us do appreciate the unit number threads decision….
Solid work boys wish other forums would follow suit.
Well aren’t you just a Debbie downer.Those threads will still exist, just on other sites with other owners making those ad dollars.
We don't have any control of what other sites do. As a rokslide member, moderator, and hunter, I appreciate our stance on not allowing these types of threads.Those threads will still exist, just on other sites with other owners making those ad dollars.
I don’t share much info on units on the web but how else is anyone to get a basic understanding of terrain, habitat and animal populations without being able to ask
Agree. Lots of general info can be shared without spoiling anything. I dont agree with deleting threads but I think locking the thread is ok as people can still PM and specifics stay private.I’ll speak an opinion that probably isn’t going to be popular, I think unit number threads should exist. I would venture to guess almost every one of us has gone to the internet sleuthing to find info on a unit before deciding to apply/hunt there. Unit number threads aren’t the problem, it is when guys get super specific with information about specific spots in the threads that is the problem. I don’t share much info on units on the web but how else is anyone to get a basic understanding of terrain, habitat and animal populations without being able to ask, and for some units/places there may not be people that we know personally to be able to ask for information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ll speak an opinion that probably isn’t going to be popular, I think unit number threads should exist.
Nice if you live close enough to do that. If you coming from the east coast it's no feasible. I did a WY elk last year and receive some general information that helped me get into elk quickly. It was a specific area just terrain that I should look towards. I was appreciative. This year I have shared my tracks with two guys that drew that area this year. Hope it helps them out.Boots on the ground?
Couldn’t agree more. I don’t think this is an unpopular opinion. But i also don’t mind the decision, it makes total sense. Need to give if you want to get.I’ll speak an opinion that probably isn’t going to be popular, I think unit number threads should exist. I would venture to guess almost every one of us has gone to the internet sleuthing to find info on a unit before deciding to apply/hunt there. Unit number threads aren’t the problem, it is when guys get super specific with information about specific spots in the threads that is the problem. I don’t share much info on units on the web but how else is anyone to get a basic understanding of terrain, habitat and animal populations without being able to ask, and for some units/places there may not be people that we know personally to be able to ask for information.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You become an actively participating member of the forum. You interact with other members. Make some posts when it’s a topic that you have knowledge about. Get your name out there. Can be simple threads. What broadheads do you shoot, how many arrows in quiver, how do you tie your boot laces etc.. If somebody makes a good post, hit the like button. That gets your name out there and others will begin to recognize it.but how else is anyone to get a basic understanding of terrain, habitat and animal populations without being able to ask,
I have helped a couple folks with questions regarding Wyoming. I let them ask me in a pm about the unit and advice. I have done so enough that I can tell who has done research and who is just fishing for my work that I have already put in.I'm one of the guys that broke the rule last week, unaware of the new policy. I understand the reason for it now and don't disagree. My mistake.
I've asked a couple of the mods how to go about asking for help on a unit. Yes, I do a lot of my own research, and at times I think of things that aren't easily found online. Or, as was the case this past week, thought of weather impacts after the draw. Should I have thought of that before putting in for a second choice? Yep, probably so.
Any feedback would be appreciated.