Time for another 7 Backcountry Thread

Joined
Dec 6, 2019
Messages
300
I'm not blown away by the caliber, but the concept might be interesting - if those steel cases could be manufactured for existing guns/calibers, and then allow 80k psi. A reach, but they mention that backthrust with steel is less than brass cases at normal pressures. I don't know if backthrust is the limiting factor for rifle pressures, maybe yall can fill me in.

That COULD mean Creedmoor performance in a Grendel, with ~20% less recoil (since powder weight is part of the recoil calculation, comparing a Grendel with 30gr/80k vs Creed at 45gr/60k in GRT and online recoil calcs)?

I can't imagine it would be that easy. Right?

 

Megalodon

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Dec 8, 2019
Messages
291
If you look around enough you'll find a few people that picked up the 277 Fury hybrid cases and run them at higher pressures. Those are .473 BF and the brass can be cut/mandreled like normal.
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2017
Messages
1,298
Location
Michigan
It looks interesting especially if it can be reloaded. Im not optimistic that it will take off because im not sure other brass makers will want to retool to make the cases.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
1,395
I'm not blown away by the caliber, but the concept might be interesting - if those steel cases could be manufactured for existing guns/calibers, and then allow 80k psi. A reach, but they mention that backthrust with steel is less than brass cases at normal pressures. I don't know if backthrust is the limiting factor for rifle pressures, maybe yall can fill me in.

That COULD mean Creedmoor performance in a Grendel, with ~20% less recoil (since powder weight is part of the recoil calculation, comparing a Grendel with 30gr/80k vs Creed at 45gr/60k in GRT and online recoil calcs)?

I can't imagine it would be that easy. Right?


I can get 80K in a regular brass-cased cartridge, but it will most likely loosen the primer pocket to the point that it makes the case unusable again. So, since this is steel cased and most likely non-reloadable, what are you actually gaining?
Leave it to an ammunition manufacturer to come up with a "new" concept that basically makes you dependent on them to provide you ammo. Reminds me of the Remington E-tronics.

Hard pass from me.
 

Mikey_B79

FNG
Joined
Jul 28, 2023
Messages
34
Location
Manitoba
I can get 80K in a regular brass-cased cartridge, but it will most likely loosen the primer pocket to the point that it makes the case unusable again. So, since this is steel cased and most likely non-reloadable, what are you actually gaining?
Leave it to an ammunition manufacturer to come up with a "new" concept that basically makes you dependent on them to provide you ammo. Reminds me of the Remington E-tronics.

Hard pass from me.
They specifically mention that it is reloadable.

The Peak Alloy case is also reloadable when following Federal’s lab-tested processes and data.

I'm interested to know what those processes are. Also interested to know if this is where the world's supply of RL-26 has gone.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Messages
1,395
They specifically mention that it is reloadable.

The Peak Alloy case is also reloadable when following Federal’s lab-tested processes and data.

The proverbial "they" said that about steel cased 7.62X39 and 5.56 cases back in the day too. Didn't work out too well. The amount of sizing required to ensure adequate feeding led to case life being about 2-3 shots. Not to mention that you couldn't anneal it so if the web didn't fail the necks split.
 

Mikey_B79

FNG
Joined
Jul 28, 2023
Messages
34
Location
Manitoba
The proverbial "they" said that about steel cased 7.62X39 and 5.56 cases back in the day too. Didn't work out too well. The amount of sizing required to ensure adequate feeding led to case life being about 2-3 shots. Not to mention that you couldn't anneal it so if the web didn't fail the necks split.
Agree - if the process is onerous or has a high failure rate case life will be miserable enough that it won't be worth it. I'm sure there is some consideration around how they sell more boxes of factory ammo in all of this, for sure.
 

Lou270

WKR
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
306
Federal can sell cases to other manufacturers to load. Hornady does this with the PRCs for
Ex. and people seem happy with that.

Lou
 

mt100gr.

WKR
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
3,126
Location
NW MT
i think someone needs it in a straight pull ... then rename it to the 280 impaler
Put a Scythe on the thing and have excitement on both ends!!

Seriously tho, I'm curious about the compatibility with current suppressors or if this could lead to another segment of that market? (FWIW, I'll be surprised if it takes off)
 

Lou270

WKR
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
306
Put a Scythe on the thing and have excitement on both ends!!

Seriously tho, I'm curious about the compatibility with current suppressors or if this could lead to another segment of that market? (FWIW, I'll be surprised if it takes off)
I am in same boat. I am sort of interested in the 277 fury as don’t need the hp of the 175+ that make 7mm sexy. I asked Q is trashpanda would support these high pressure rounds and they said not tested so not recommended. Dropping another 1k+ on suppressor is not exciting

Lou
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
404
Location
NV
As others are saying I'm very curious to see how this plays out with suppressors. More chamber pressure does not necessarily mean more muzzle blast. I THINK it could actually lead to reduced muzzle pressure due to the pressure peaking sooner. We will need some testing to tell.

I am personally excited about the cartridge and believe it will do much better than 6.8W. I'm excited about true magnum performance out of short barrels. It looks to get just shy of 2900 fps with a 175 grain out of a 16" barrel. I also am excited by the slim cases as an extra round or 2 in the magazine is nice to have. I think it can easily dethrone 7PRC as well especially on the heels of powder gate. I am a reloader but could potentially be interested in this cartridge and just buying factory ammo if reloading doesn't pan out well. Even if you do reload and only get 3 firings I wouldn't consider that a failure for a low volume hunting gun.

Barrel life is a non-issue IMO especially with the new Seekins with quick change barrels. By the time I need to buy a new $600 barrel I will have spent $2k on ammo.
 

ElPollo

WKR
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
1,769
Curious as to why the case design on this cartridge is circa 1915 except for the case materials. It looks exactly like a 30/06-270 win-280 rem. Long action, skinny case, and no 35-40 degree shoulder. Seems like it ignores all of the improvements in cartridge design since PO Ackley. Perhaps the steel case is the reason for that. Maybe it won’t handle the steep shoulders.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2020
Messages
733
Curious as to why the case design on this cartridge is circa 1915 except for the case materials. It looks exactly like a 30/06-270 win-280 rem. Long action, skinny case, and no 35-40 degree shoulder. Seems like it ignores all of the improvements in cartridge design since PO Ackley. Perhaps the steel case is the reason for that. Maybe it won’t handle the steep shoulders.
I wondered the same thing about the steep shoulders and cartridge design
 
Top