Tikka T3X Lite Stainless 6.5 PRC

Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
2,316
I thought I’d do a little show and tell of my new Tikka.

I was considering a Roughtech, but it was hard to pass up a $679 stainless T3x Lite stainless from Euro Optic. I had Bug Holes cut it back to 22” and thread it 1/2x28”. Cost was $100.

$779 for a threaded, stainless Tikka is a good deal.

Anyways, immediately installed vertical grip, trigger spring, Limbsaver recoil pad and Beartooth cheek riser. Done.

It’s a shooter, which is never a surprise. H4831 SC handloads with 143 ELDX.

100 yards

IMG_2846.jpeg

300 yards

IMG_2847.jpeg

600 yards


IMG_2848.jpeg


IMG_2841.jpeg

Balances just in front of magazine with Banish Backcountry installed

IMG_2851.jpeg
 
Why such a long barrel???

1) It’s more quiet

2) Less loss in performance

3) Full powder burn

3) Doesn’t impede my style of hunting

Cutting barrels back to 16-18” is a lot of blast for a suppressor to dampen. Longer barrels, especially with faster burning powders, are going to be more quiet.
 
I’ve got the same gun and it stacks tiny groups.
Mine is cut back to 20” and threaded.
Shoots factory 147eldm and 140 tipped fusions 1/2” groups and even tighter with 130tmks loaded over N565

Mine is running slow right now but the accuracy over shadows lower speed. Amazing accuracy with 54.5 grains H4831SC and 143 ELDX. I loaded up 55-57 to see where it maxes out on pressure. Hornady published max is 54.7 and I’m nowhere near the max at 54.5.
 
1) It’s more quiet

2) Less loss in performance

3) Full powder burn

3) Doesn’t impede my style of hunting

Cutting barrels back to 16-18” is a lot of blast for a suppressor to dampen. Longer barrels, especially with faster burning powders, are going to be more quiet.
Dosent the powder all burn up like nearly instantly? It’s not like I burnt powder flies out the barrel.
 
Barrel length is a personal decision - 22" is about as long as I go now with a suppressor. Definitely don't need to chop every rifle to 16-18" just to use a can.
 
Back
Top