Tikka 6.5cm or 243 for new rifle purchase

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,084
Hey everyone,

So I have read a lot of the smaller then traditional caliber threads and they are interesting. Life has gotten busy and I do not have the time to handload anymore for the amount I like to shoot.

Here is some questions before I purchase a tikka while they are on sale

I have a 30-06 in a 8lb set up shooting 180s at 2780 fps and it gets tiring shooting it at the range and spotting shots is impossible.

Can you spot shots in a 6.5 cm? Would like to be under 7lbs set up with this build. How much does upgrading the stock help for spotting shots?

I also noticed that the 6.5cm only has a muzzle velocity of 2550 for a 143 with a 20” barrel. I know that is fast enough for a bullet to expand but would going to a 243 and a 90grn eldx at 3000 fps be a better set up due to the muzzle velocity?

Most of my shoots are under 200 yards but I have taken elk at 600 yards. I practice a lot of longe range in the summer.


Let me know everyone’s thoughts please


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Firestone

WKR
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
687
Location
Northwest Montana
I've had a few different tikkas in 6.5cm, they all shot really good. One was a dedicated mule deer gun for about 6 years and that 143eldx worked amazing at creed velocities.
 

Dmoua

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jun 6, 2023
Messages
176
I don't know if 3000 FPS is achievable with factory 90gr bullets from a .243. Maybe with a 24” barrel. My wife has a 20” 243 and shoot it around the 2800 fps range with 90gr TGK bullets that I load.

Shooting a lightweight rifle will make spotting your own shots under 500 yards pretty difficult. It takes a lot of discipline.

My vote is on the 6.5 CM. Better ammo selection if you don’t plan to load for it.
 
OP
Elite

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,084
I don't know if 3000 FPS is achievable with factory 90gr bullets from a .243. Maybe with a 24” barrel. My wife has a 20” 243 and shoot it around the 2800 fps range with 90gr TGK bullets that I load.

Shooting a lightweight rifle will make spotting your own shots under 500 yards pretty difficult. It takes a lot of discipline.

My vote is on the 6.5 CM. Better ammo selection if you don’t plan to load for it.

Even with a 6.5 cm would be hard to spot shots?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TxLite

WKR
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
2,037
Location
Texas
Even with a 6.5 cm would be hard to spot shots?
Stock ergos will help with that. That was the driving effort behind the rokstock, but there are also others that are going to be more forgiving than most factory stocks
 

Dmoua

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
Jun 6, 2023
Messages
176
Even with a 6.5 cm would be hard to spot shots?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Depends. Do you blink when a shot goes off? It’s an acquired skill imo to be able to spot shots. Longer range is easier because the shooter has time to recover after the shot goes off.
 

Vern400

WKR
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
495
It'll be difficult with a lightweight rifle to spot shots. In general that takes a lot of fire control discipline.
Your order of suitability for elk is
30/06 then 6.5 then 243 then 223 then 22 mag.

Didn't want to leave anybody out :)

Seriously though, if you drop 20% on foot pounds of recoil, and you dropped 20% on weight, it's a toss up which rifle will give you less felt recoil.

The 6.5 CM recoil allows you to pretty much shoot all day. I was shooting 308 beside 6.5 suppressed last weekend, and it's hard to say the 6.5 creedmoor isn't pretty sweet. And that makes perfect sense.
A 165 at 2800 fps comparing to
140gr at 2700 fps.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
2,779
My 6.5CM is a Bergara, not a Tikka, but similar weight. I am not able to spot all of my shots, but do watch them hit regularly. Last fall, I watched my elk drop through the scope upon impact.

I also have a .243 that is not a Tikka. All things equal, the .243 will be easier to spot.

My 6.5 barrel is 22" and I believe the muzzle velocity is about 2700fps. I have no idea what my .243 is at the muzzle.

Since you referenced the Hornady 143, I have copied a response from them. I asked about their 6.5 testing and the possibility of heavier factory offerings for the .243.

"Thank you for contacting us. 6.5 Creedmoor ammunition is tested in a 24" barrel with a 1:8" twist. Elevation is 1800' ASL. While there are no immediate plans for a 108 ELD-Match load for the 243 Win, we will certainly forward the suggestion to management for consideration."
 

Darryle

WKR
Classified Approved
Joined
Nov 25, 2016
Messages
657
Location
Fort Worth, Texas
It's hard to argue against a 6.5 Creedmoor, plenty of available ammo, wide variety of bullet choices, velocities and it's generally very accurate out of the gate and easy on the barrel, providing plenty of life, especially if you are not stepping on the throttle.
 
OP
Elite

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,084
Just looking on tikkas website and it shows the 6.5 cm only holds 3 in mag? But the 6.5 prc holds 4? Why is this


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Messages
570
I was able to spot 95 percent of my shots from a factory tikka 6.5 creed cut to 20 inches with a 147 eldm at 2600. Added a can and that got better, then added a krg bravo and i don’t think I’ve missed spotting a shot inside 60 yards with a fixed 10x.
 

billoo349

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 26, 2020
Messages
199
Just looking on tikkas website and it shows the 6.5 cm only holds 3 in mag? But the 6.5 prc holds 4? Why is this


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It comes with a 3 round but you can get a 5 round. Not sure on the prc. My thought would be the picture on the Tikka site is not actually showing a 4 round magnum magazine because it should be more proud of the bottom metal.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,535
I always like to have a 243 around - it’s an easy to shoot round that makes an ideal plinking, rock shooting, coyote, antelope and mule deer if you’re careful. It’s been used a lot and has a good track record for those things. My 243 has taken a cow elk - a 100 gr partition through the middle of both lungs and she made it past 4 football fields of sagebrush before piling up. At least when used with that bullet, in the timber 4 football fields is a long long way and a guy’s tracking skills better be sharp.

If it’s going to be used less on the smaller targets and more on the larger, including elk, then it seems reasonable to go with the 6.5, and guys using it for that range of critters seem to do better than they should.
 
OP
Elite

Elite

WKR
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Messages
1,084
I always like to have a 243 around - it’s an easy to shoot round that makes an ideal plinking, rock shooting, coyote, antelope and mule deer if you’re careful. It’s been used a lot and has a good track record for those things. My 243 has taken a cow elk - a 100 gr partition through the middle of both lungs and she made it past 4 football fields of sagebrush before piling up. At least when used with that bullet, in the timber 4 football fields is a long long way and a guy’s tracking skills better be sharp.

If it’s going to be used less on the smaller targets and more on the larger, including elk, then it seems reasonable to go with the 6.5, and guys using it for that range of critters seem to do better than they should.

Partition is a very strong bullet. It wouldn’t have much effect on lungs only


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TaperPin

WKR
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
3,535
Partition is a very strong bullet. It wouldn’t have much effect on lungs only


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It works quite well on smallish antelope lungs - the front 1/3 sheds off in fragments, not what I’d call very strong. It’s just not very large.
 

thinhorn_AK

"DADDY"
Joined
Jul 2, 2016
Messages
11,302
Location
Alaska
Partition is a very strong bullet. It wouldn’t have much effect on lungs only


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ve decked caribou, moose and bear with partitions. They will absolutely work.

OP, the tikka 6.5 creedmoor is rad.
 

BKM

Lil-Rokslider
Joined
May 5, 2024
Messages
116
I jumped on the 6.5cm bandwagon this year after watching since its birth. I’m not sure what I was waiting for, low recoil and shoots everything well. Spotting close Shots is hard, but do you really need to spot a shot at 100? By 200 yards I can spot them all.
 

PC356

Lil-Rokslider
Classified Approved
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Messages
280
I don't know if 3000 FPS is achievable with factory 90gr bullets from a .243. Maybe with a 24” barrel. My wife has a 20” 243 and shoot it around the 2800 fps range with 90gr TGK bullets that I load.

Shooting a lightweight rifle will make spotting your own shots under 500 yards pretty difficult. It takes a lot of discipline.

My vote is on the 6.5 CM. Better ammo selection if you don’t plan to load for it.
Last Friday I was tuning an eBay parts 20” Tikka .243 barrel I had just acquired. Runnin off the shelf 90 gr ELD-Xs they were hitting 2989.0. Went thru several boxes of shells and chrono’d every shot thru my Garmin and saw similar. Here’s the first 10 shot session:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1665.png
    IMG_1665.png
    207.9 KB · Views: 30
Last edited:
Top