Thermal Scope with LRF vs monocular with LRF

[TWard]

Looking for advice...

Currently have a 384 scope without LRF. In the market to buy an optic with LRF. Currently shooting a 243 with 1" high at 100, dead on 200, 5.5 low at 300. Not interested in shooting past 250.

Would you buy a scope with LRF capabilites/ ballistics calculator AND monocular without LRF.

Or

Scope without LRF and a monocular with LRF. Knowing the gun is pretty flat shooting 0-250.

Either way the LRF is achieved, just thinking it through and difficult to decide.

 

[waspocrew]

I have LRF on both, but if choosing between the two, I'd prefer LRF in the scope. I use my scanner all the time, but once I have a predator coming in, I'll hop on the rifle and go from there. The ballistic software takes all the guesswork out. I was making shots on jack rabbits with ease to 400 last night with my 22 Creed.