wind gypsy
"DADDY"
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
- Messages
- 10,393
Only needed a strap wrench to get one off, never to stay put on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think i have shit threads as my scythe his come loose a time or two and I'm always checking it. Next time I shoot I'll try and really tighten down when it's warm. Good to know, thanks.We are way overthinking this DT issue. Shoot a few rounds to warm it up, then get it as hand-tight as possible. Unless you have shit threads, they don't come loose.
No, it’ll get better as you get more carbon on both the threads of the suppressor and the barrel. Mine doesn’t come loose nearly as much as it did when it was new, and as Ryan said, just give it a good torque after a handful of shots.I think i have shit threads as my scythe his come loose a time or two and I'm always checking it. Next time I shoot I'll try and really tighten down when it's warm. Good to know, thanks.
Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk
I think i have shit threads as my scythe his come loose a time or two and I'm always checking it. Next time I shoot I'll try and really tighten down when it's warm. Good to know, thanks.
Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk
I was interested in the ATech too - not so much for the adapter, but as they do a 338 cal option.been running direct thread for 20 years and never had an issue, i do cheek the can from time to time when out spotlighting rabbits and hares but could count on one hand times its come loose.
Im tempted to try an ATech that has a adaptor to simplify but i know of 3 people that have had issues with there zero moving with them
No shifting zero slightly around when removing and reattaching the suppressor, he found that it helped to always index it so the label was on top and that helped minimize it.I was interested in the ATech too - not so much for the adapter, but as they do a 338 cal option.
Do you mean zero shifting from a non-suppressed barrel (which is common), or zero shifting during the use of the ATech? If the latter, what would cause that if the can doesn't shift?
Old thought from the Federal Backcountry podcasts:
Ryan keeps saying that Federals claim of less recoil is bogus. But smaller cartridges that are more efficient do produce less actual foot pounds of recoil than larger cartridges. Even when launching the same bullet at the same velocity.
This is because the amount of powder being burned contributes to the recoil.
For example: when sending a 178gr ELD-M at 3000fps in a 8.25 pound gun a 300 WISM creates @29.03 fps of recoil while a 300 win mag creates @32.22 pounds of recoil.
Choice of powder makes a slight difference as well.
While I share skepticism about the cartridge overall I do think their claim of lighter recoil is valid. Albeit, its just a few footpounds.
Personally, I hope they work out the handloading and accuracy issues as I think more velocity in a smaller cartridge would be awesome!
I haven’t taken a physics class since highschool but doesn’t force = mass x acceleration?Old thought from the Federal Backcountry podcasts:
Ryan keeps saying that Federals claim of less recoil is bogus. But smaller cartridges that are more efficient do produce less actual foot pounds of recoil than larger cartridges. Even when launching the same bullet at the same velocity.
This is because the amount of powder being burned contributes to the recoil.
For example: when sending a 178gr ELD-M at 3000fps in a 8.25 pound gun a 300 WISM creates @29.03 fps of recoil while a 300 win mag creates @32.22 pounds of recoil.
Choice of powder makes a slight difference as well.
While I share skepticism about the cartridge overall I do think their claim of lighter recoil is valid. Albeit, its just a few footpounds.
Personally, I hope they work out the handloading and accuracy issues as I think more velocity in a smaller cartridge would be awesome!
I haven’t taken a physics class since highschool but doesn’t force = mass x acceleration?
If the bullet weight is identical and the acceleration is identical then how would the force be different between 300wsm and 300wm? I don’t see how the powder charge has anything to do with this.
Copy. I hadn’t considered the mass and direction of the powder. Thank youPowder has mass and that mass accelerates forward out of the barrel. There is an equal and opposite reaction to said powder mass's acceleration out of the barrel.
20k psi higher chamber pressure will likely be higher muzzle pressures right? More muzzle pressure will be added recoil.Powder has mass and that mass accelerates forward out of the barrel. There is an equal and opposite reaction to said powder mass's acceleration out of the barrel.
Wouldn't that be encompassed in the velocity portion of the equation?20k psi higher chamber pressure will likely be higher muzzle pressures right? More muzzle pressure will be added recoil.
I think that you are right that the difference is minor and not worth considering when choosing a cartridge. The biggest differences I've seen in running some comparisons were a few foot pounds of force.The only difference between the two (if bullet and velocity and barrel length is identical) is the powder mass and internal ballistics changing the recoil impulse and pressure. So there's going to be a hair more recoil with the larger case just from the extra powder. How the recoil impulse and pressure change the total amount of perceived recoil, I don't know.
I don't think it would make enough difference to matter if considering 7 backcountry or 7prc