The Rokslide Stock Traders Thread

Anyone following the Radiant Nuclear portable (shipping container size) mass producible reactors? They’re testing one soon in the .gov Idaho test facility. They aren’t public but may something to watch.


I'm a nuclear fan and think these small reactor clusters are the way to go. I have done some research but I'm not an expert or even have a solid educated opinion.....so factor that into my comments.

Isn't it like anything else in the investing world? A cutting edge tech with a lot of players and a lot of hype/speculation...that has not been completely developed. At my knowledge level, its more of a horse race than an investment thesis.

The ETF is mostly Cameco and Uranium suppliers.

Over the past 4+ decades, I know guys that have bet on the right horse on these new tech cutting edge investments.....but fully 9 out of 10 friends admit to losing money on these penny stocks and too early developmental companies. Losing your ass on one stock kills your overall performance.

A couple years back, NuScale made it sound like they are ready to start cranking these things out and put them in use. Nope- not fully developed....and then there is the almost 10 year construction, permit and gov approval stage. Hopefully this admin can streamline that to a few years...but still.
 
Anyone following the Radiant Nuclear portable (shipping container size) mass producible reactors? They’re testing one soon in the .gov Idaho test facility. They aren’t public but may something to watch.


We did a couple private investments in SMR producers last year, so I spent quite a bit of time in the weeds here. My honest opinion is that the most of the listed SMR producers are fairly well priced today. We and alot of other institutional capital poured into them in 2025, and certain of the upside to them was priced out as a result. I personally don't hold SMR exposure in my own portfolio today.

Physical uranium seems like the much better trade today if you want nuclear exposure, which you all should in my opinion. Even more so considering that the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SRUUF) will often trade at a discount to NAV. I've had ~10% of my portfolio in SRUUF since 2021 and continue to add to that position on days when it is trading at a discount. I believe physical uranium is one of the safer 2 - 3x trades over the next ~5 years. As long as Israel doesn't throw a tactical nuke into Iran, it's about as asymetric of a trade as currently exists given the underlying supply/demand fundamentals to uranium.

I dabble in some of the juniors, but don't have enough conviction in any single producer to make a reccomendation there to my Rokslide friends. If you want nuclear exposure, prioritize physicals via SRUUF. If you have a higher risk tolerance and want a bit more leverage to the trade, buy a basket of juniors in the form of URNJ or something similar.
 
A couple years back, NuScale made it sound like they are ready to start cranking these things out and put them in use. Nope- not fully developed....
Radiant is supposedly ready to deploy by 2028 if all goes well in testing. They’ve got a contract in hand for a bunch of them for a large data center. These things are self contained and designed to replace or substitute a portable diesel generator. Plop them down, hookup electrical and go. Fan cooled, no water and run for 5 years before they need to be refueled. They can be refueled I believe 4x for a life of 20 years. Looking forward to see how that all plays out.
 
We hear about insider trading......heres an example of why we need Congress to shut it down...and why they won't;

April 7th someone bought 10,000 one day SPY calls at $.96 before the market closed.

Trump announces cease fire

Sold the next morning for $4.16. $960,000 to $4,160,000 in less than a day.
Nah, that’s not insider trading. That just really smart people doing their research, taking a risk, and getting a little lucky.

*sarcasm
 
It makes these pure helium plays out there more interesting and will make the natural gas companies happy.
It makes certain of the midstream companies happy, not necessarily the upstream producers. And those midstream companies that do have uncontracted LNG export capacity have already seen their stock prices run up a decent amount (e.g., Venture Global).

I'd be careful trading natural gas production on the prospects of Hormuz. We need to remember that US and Canada don't have the infrastructure to sell natural gas into global markets to the extent that we should. Gas could trade at $20 in europe, and trade at $3 dollars in the states. Europe could be having a full on energy crisis, and US nat gas producers could be drowning in excess natural gas..

One of the hottest investments in private equity over the past 2+ years has been energy midstream and downstream infrastructure development projects, specifically LNG liquifaction projects aimed at increasing the supply of LNG exports. There will undoubtedly be a time when US natural gas trades similar to global natural gas because of these recent investments, but as of today, it is simply impossible.

I like Comstok Resources as a levered nat gas bet for what its worth. Most of the more mature, production oriented names in the space have allready re-rated quite a bit such as Devon/Coterra. Comstock is more of an exploration play of course, but sits on some of the last great shale resources in the Haynesville.
 
We hear about insider trading......heres an example of why we need Congress to shut it down...and why they won't;

April 7th someone bought 10,000 one day SPY calls at $.96 before the market closed.

Trump announces cease fire

Sold the next morning for $4.16. $960,000 to $4,160,000 in less than a day.
I only need 10% of this action, once per qtr.... :)
 
Worth a listen y’all. Erik hosts a great podcast, and Adam is one of the better real assets fund managers out there. I trust him with about 15% of my 401k today. Here is his view on the best opportunities in resource investing, recorded yesterday.

Adam’s mutual fund is GRHAX if anyone finds his investment positioning interesting.

 
Risky bet. I think much of the war disruption is already priced in the market.

April 22nd is apparently the date we hit a massive supply problem. If we get to April 22 with no oil passing or having passed through the strait, then $120 minimum per barrel, potentially with a steady rise from there if there is nothing else on the way as the last of the gulf oil shipments are expected to arrive to US ports on 4/15. These are the ships that exited the straight on or before 2/28 before the war kicked off.
 
Risky bet. I think much of the war disruption is already priced in the market.
Are you aware that the the market is currently pricing in a return to $75 oil by this upcoming fall? The current oil price strip is pricing in little war disruption in my opinion.. There remains upside in this trade, though of course it isn't as ideal of an entry point as it was 4 weeks ago, and you do need to be more selective about how you implement today. I do this for a living and we are still buyers today of the equities of oil producers. Cost average yourself in starting today, if you haven't already. There will be a 2 - 3 year opportunity for a broader re-rating of the equities of oil and gas producers.

That said, if you all want an Iran related trade that is earlier in the tooth, then perhaps look to the ticker CORN. Agriculture products, specifically corn, will benefit in two ways:
  • increased ethanol usage - as oil becomes scarcer and more expensive, you will see increased ethonal blending amongst petrochemical producers. India quietly announced an increase from 10 - 15% ethanol usage in gasoline already...
  • decreased outputs - fertilizer is amongst one of the most impacted input materials from the current closure of the Straight, with > 25% of the world's fertilizer held up currently. Less fertilizer will equal incrementally lower crop yeilds this growing season
Combine i) moderate prcies today, with ii) less corn likely produced in the near term, and iii) significantly more corn consumed in the near term, and you have a pretty asymetric trade in my opinion.
 
I Am highly invested in the Data Center buildout....and there are reports now that conflict with that thesis. It appears it not all rosy moving forward due to power restraints.

One here from ZERO HEDGE

Excerpt, full article on Zero Hedge, with footnotes;

Canaccord Genuity analyst George Gianarikas writes, "the American data center boom is hitting a formidable wall of logistical friction." He is referring to the latest outlook by Sightline Climate, which is also reinforced by recent articles from Bloomberg and others, and reveals a sobering reality for 2026: nearly half of the nation's planned 16-gigawatt capacity faces cancellation or delay, with only 5 gigawatts currently under construction.

This inertia stems from a volatile mix of local permitting hurdles, community resistance, and a desperate reliance on overextended global supply chains for critical components like transformers and helium.

That's right: half.

That's right: despite $700BN+ of expected 2026 hyperscaler capex, nearly half of the data centers scheduled to begin operations in the US
in 2026 "will either face delays or outright cancellations." The data, which comes from Sightline Climate's 2026 Data Center Outlook, suggests that just 30% - 50% of the ~16 GW of planned US capacity for the year will face risks, with only ~5 GW currently under construction!

______

The insinuation is that Stocks like NVDA, AVGO and all of the AI and data center related companies will get hit hard. To me the question for something like NVDA is whether their growth drops from 100% a year to 80%, is it really a big deal?
 
Are you aware that the the market is currently pricing in a return to $75 oil by this upcoming fall? The current oil price strip is pricing in little war disruption in my opinion.. There remains upside in this trade, though of course it isn't as ideal of an entry point as it was 4 weeks ago, and you do need to be more selective about how you implement today. I do this for a living and we are still buyers today of the equities of oil producers. Cost average yourself in starting today, if you haven't already. There will be a 2 - 3 year opportunity for a broader re-rating of the equities of oil and gas producers.

That said, if you all want an Iran related trade that is earlier in the tooth, then perhaps look to the ticker CORN. Agriculture products, specifically corn, will benefit in two ways:
  • increased ethanol usage - as oil becomes scarcer and more expensive, you will see increased ethonal blending amongst petrochemical producers. India quietly announced an increase from 10 - 15% ethanol usage in gasoline already...
  • decreased outputs - fertilizer is amongst one of the most impacted input materials from the current closure of the Straight, with > 25% of the world's fertilizer held up currently. Less fertilizer will equal incrementally lower crop yeilds this growing season
Combine i) moderate prcies today, with ii) less corn likely produced in the near term, and iii) significantly more corn consumed in the near term, and you have a pretty asymetric trade in my opinion.
As someone who is not at all an expert (as you seem to be), I would agree that it hasn't seemed like the markets have priced in the oil shock very much at all. There seems to be this idea that DJT will somehow fix this and everything will go back to normal instantly. But when you're talking about physical commodities that need to be moved around the world, the effects can last for a pretty long time. COVID shutdowns should have showed us how long supply shocks can have an effect.

I generally am betting on incompetence and stupidity from this administration leading to higher oil prices for the long term. And that doesn't seem to be showing up in the markets yet.
 
There seems to be this idea that DJT will somehow fix this and everything will go back to normal instantly.
This administration and trump himself has stated that it will not go back instantly. They are aware that it will take some time for things to normalize. It’s not a secret that they traded this aspect for what they see as longer term stability with Iran going forward and into the future. As far as botching it time will tell.

Every time someone starts screaming that the sky is falling after a trump administration action has turned out to be pretty much wrong. Tariffs and stock market crash anyone? The market makers for sure are going to do what they do. They will take advantage of any news and will play the market just like they always do.

And please don’t turn this into a political bashing contest.
 
One to watch here is one I bought and recently and recommended here that has gone through a tough streak and its starting to move- BX. They are the gold standard in their space...though many of the private equity companies have taken it on the chin.

It seems that storm is starting to subside in private equity....their earnings come out on the 23rd and there must be some inklings or leaks that it will be good because the stock is up $5 today on no real news. Plus, it pays a 4.13% dividend at today's price....so better than the UST money market funds. FWIW, I recommended it a month ago or so here.....I still think it's a good LT buy now.
 
I dabble in some of the juniors, but don't have enough conviction in any single producer to make a reccomendation there to my Rokslide friends. If you want nuclear exposure, prioritize physicals via SRUUF. If you have a higher risk tolerance and want a bit more leverage to the trade, buy a basket of juniors in the form of URNJ or something similar.
Care to mention some of those juniors your watching for uranium? Anfield, AEC, is drilling where I live so I've been reading what they're up to.
 
As someone who is not at all an expert (as you seem to be), I would agree that it hasn't seemed like the markets have priced in the oil shock very much at all. There seems to be this idea that DJT will somehow fix this and everything will go back to normal instantly. But when you're talking about physical commodities that need to be moved around the world, the effects can last for a pretty long time. COVID shutdowns should have showed us how long supply shocks can have an effect.

I generally am betting on incompetence and stupidity from this administration leading to higher oil prices for the long term. And that doesn't seem to be showing up in the markets yet.

Even if the war concluded tomorrow, it would take 6 - 9 months at minimum to i) turn back on production that has been turned off in the middle east, and ii) refill strategic reserves that are currently getting drained. Enough damage has been done already that it starts getting hard to underwrite < $85 oil by year-end even if things were resolved tomorrow.

This administration and trump himself has stated that it will not go back instantly. They are aware that it will take some time for things to normalize. It’s not a secret that they traded this aspect for what they see as longer term stability with Iran going forward and into the future. As far as botching it time will tell.

Every time someone starts screaming that the sky is falling after a trump administration action has turned out to be pretty much wrong. Tariffs and stock market crash anyone? The market makers for sure are going to do what they do. They will take advantage of any news and will play the market just like they always do.

And please don’t turn this into a political bashing contest.

They already botched it. The current admin would have never got involved here had they thought for a second that the Straight of Hormuz could be closed as a result. To their defense, Iran couldn't close the Straight, nor did they close the Strait, so they were right there. What they didn't underwrite though is that the insurance agencies could effectively close the straight by cancelling policies to any ship who dared the passage, which is what ultiamtely happened here.

Regarding your 'sky is falling' comment. This is different. This can't be fixed with a tweet. We are talking about upwards of 20% of global petro inputs stalled for over a month now. You're living in a fairy tail if you think this is anything remotely like the tarrif shock. Institutional capital has de-risked over recent weeks..

Sure, could trump tweet tomorrow that a deal has been reached? would equities surge? and oil tank? Yes, that is all very much realistic. But that would be a short term, knee jerk-like reaction to a structural contagion that was already let loose. I'd be trimming my broader equities exposure, and buying oil producers in this event. Similar to what I did last week when the ceasefire was announced when I put in a significant buy on Petrobras.

I'm neutral equities today so don't think we'll see things decay too quickly; But Sticky oil prices, inflation and rates, will ultimately lead to a win for the bears by year end should that occur, in my opinion. I'm trimming on overly optimisitic market reactions to Trump tweets and expect to be underweight equities shortly!

One to watch here is one I bought and recently and recommended here that has gone through a tough streak and its starting to move- BX. They are the gold standard in their space...though many of the private equity companies have taken it on the chin.

It seems that storm is starting to subside in private equity....their earnings come out on the 23rd and there must be some inklings or leaks that it will be good because the stock is up $5 today on no real news. Plus, it pays a 4.13% dividend at today's price....so better than the UST money market funds. FWIW, I recommended it a month ago or so here.....I still think it's a good LT buy now.

I wouldn't invest in the equities of asset managers directly today. I would, and do, dabble however in some of their underlying BDCs where private credit contagion fears have been overblown. Names to consider there would be GBDC and SLR for example, though both are already starting to recover slightly in recent couple weeks.

If you want PE, buy into a recently launched interval fund. You'll avoid all the market related volatility of holding the equities such as BX. CAPVX is where I park ~17.5% of my 401K and would fit your bill here but isn't easily traded and need to be willing to sign up to a longer vision.
 
Regarding your 'sky is falling' comment. This is different. This can't be fixed with a tweet. We are talking about upwards of 20% of global petro inputs stalled for over a month now. You're living in a fairy tail if you think this is anything remotely like the tarrif shock. Institutional capital has de-risked over recent weeks..
Did I not say that this wasn't going to be resolved quickly?
 
Back
Top