Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Curious - where do you rate the image stabilizing Sig binos? I don't nerd out on binos and probably won't but I do follow what you're saying. I like the image technology a lot and my needs would be primarily hunting.I'm a bino junkie. I love trying out new glass and I've done a lot of catch and release here on Rokslide. I've tried out binoculars at pretty much every price point and I love finding hidden gems that punch way above their price class. There's some obvious standouts that a lot of you are probably aware of and some you may not be.
$200 - Sightron Blue Sky 8x32
$500- Athlon Cronus
$1k- Maven B series, Meopta Meostar, Nikon Monarch HG
I personally think $1k is the value sweet spot. I've tried most of the well known models at one point or another and the reality is they're all really good. My personal favorites are the 9x45 Maven B2 and the 8x42 Nikon MHG. Both have really saturated colors, which I prefer, and the Maven is incredibly bright. The Maven's weakness is size/weight and the Nikon's weakness is that it isn't the sharpest. Both show moderate chromatic aberration, especially towards the edges.
Two years ago I picked up an Opticron Aurora BGA VHD 8x42. Despite having way too many letters in its name, its hands down the best $1k bino I've used. It's the first time I've used a bino in this class and noticed a small but obvious step up from it's competitors in pretty much every attribute. Some models have one standout feature, but maybe fall short in another area (like the Maven B2 being bright but showing a lot of CA). The Opticron is sharp across easily 90% of the field, better than the Monarch HG. It's not as bright as a Maven B2, but it hangs with anything else at this price point. Colors are incredibly saturated. The biggest thing is CA. There's virtually none in the center or on the edges. It does have a very thin blue ring around the very outer field edge, but it never pops out to me in typical use. I have to look for it.
Weight is 25 oz. Focuser is not the best, but totally adequate for hunting use.
If you're looking for a fantastic binocular, but don't want to drop $2k or more, I would highly recommend giving this one a try. There's several threads on birdwatching forums comparing them to more expensive competitors like the Zeiss SFL and Leica Noctovid that are pretty surprising.
Ive got the Pentax Z series Wp 8x42, its a super clear ,sharp binocular. Although the FOV may not be as wide as the competition, at least in both of mine, the field is great to the edge. Plus the long eye relief makes for a very comfortable eyebox. I currently own probably 50+ sets of binoculars, when going hunting i usually take the Pentax.The biggest issue with Pentax's high end binos is the field of view. 330 ft at 1000 yards for an 8x43 or 260-ish for a 10x50 isn't too competitive these days. Most 10x42 in the $1k price range are going to beat 330ft and most 12x50 will get close to 300.
I have heard really good things about their spotters.
Only 50+? You are a slacker. lolIve got the Pentax Z series Wp 8x42, its a super clear ,sharp binocular. Although the FOV may not be as wide as the competition, at least in both of mine, the field is great to the edge. Plus the long eye relief makes for a very comfortable eyebox. I currently own probably 50+ sets of binoculars, when going hunting i usually take the Pentax.
My wife isnt very happy about , ive got to sell some before she leaves me. I get the silent treatment now everytime i get a delivery. No joke!Only 50+? You are a slacker. lol
What is your go to 15x56 or higher mag bino, recommendation? I’m tempted to try this setup instead of a spotter but haven’t pony’d up the coin yet.I haven't ever looked through a set of Pentax binos. I've heard they've got some really good spotters for the money, but I'm not a big spotter guy. Usually I'm packing 15x56 if I need anything bigger than 8x.
Definitely another sleeper brand.