The best $1k binocular you haven't heard of

Hoodie

WKR
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
1,188
Location
Oregon Cascades
I'm a bino junkie. I love trying out new glass and I've done a lot of catch and release here on Rokslide. I've tried out binoculars at pretty much every price point and I love finding hidden gems that punch way above their price class. There's some obvious standouts that a lot of you are probably aware of and some you may not be.

$200 - Sightron Blue Sky 8x32
$500- Athlon Cronus
$1k- Maven B series, Meopta Meostar, Nikon Monarch HG

I personally think $1k is the value sweet spot. I've tried most of the well known models at one point or another and the reality is they're all really good. My personal favorites are the 9x45 Maven B2 and the 8x42 Nikon MHG. Both have really saturated colors, which I prefer, and the Maven is incredibly bright. The Maven's weakness is size/weight and the Nikon's weakness is that it isn't the sharpest. Both show moderate chromatic aberration, especially towards the edges.

Two years ago I picked up an Opticron Aurora BGA VHD 8x42. Despite having way too many letters in its name, its hands down the best $1k bino I've used. It's the first time I've used a bino in this class and noticed a small but obvious step up from it's competitors in pretty much every attribute. Some models have one standout feature, but maybe fall short in another area (like the Maven B2 being bright but showing a lot of CA). The Opticron is sharp across easily 90% of the field, better than the Monarch HG. It's not as bright as a Maven B2, but it hangs with anything else at this price point. Colors are incredibly saturated. The biggest thing is CA. There's virtually none in the center or on the edges. It does have a very thin blue ring around the very outer field edge, but it never pops out to me in typical use. I have to look for it.

Weight is 25 oz. Focuser is not the best, but totally adequate for hunting use.

If you're looking for a fantastic binocular, but don't want to drop $2k or more, I would highly recommend giving this one a try. There's several threads on birdwatching forums comparing them to more expensive competitors like the Zeiss SFL and Leica Noctovid that are pretty surprising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 307
I’ve been running a pair for Pentax ZD ED 10x50s for several years, to my eyes very very close to a pair of Maven 11x45s. I haven’t felt the need to upgrade so far, IMO blows anything vortex makes outta the water.
 
I’ve been running a pair for Pentax ZD ED 10x50s for several years, to my eyes very very close to a pair of Maven 11x45s. I haven’t felt the need to upgrade so far, IMO blows anything vortex makes outta the water.

Pentax is an interesting company. They make some of the best telescope eyepieces on the planet. I have a set of their DCF ED 8x43 binos which are phenomenal even at a couple times the price. I had one of their PF-80ED spotters at one time and again for the price it was really good. Their 65mm also was really good.
 
The biggest issue with Pentax's high end binos is the field of view. 330 ft at 1000 yards for an 8x43 or 260-ish for a 10x50 isn't too competitive these days. Most 10x42 in the $1k price range are going to beat 330ft and most 12x50 will get close to 300.

I have heard really good things about their spotters.
 
The biggest issue with Pentax's high end binos is the field of view. 330 ft at 1000 yards for an 8x43 or 260-ish for a 10x50 isn't too competitive these days. Most 10x42 in the $1k price range are going to beat 330ft and most 12x50 will get close to 300.

I have heard really good things about their spotters.
That is quite a difference, back when I bought these Pentax I didn’t really look into the field of view. The clarity is quite good on them overall and well built. I wouldn’t mind getting some Maven B6 10x50s next possibly.
 
Since it seems that there isnt more than 4 or maybe 6 manufacturers for scopes - not sellers, not marketers, but actual factories making the glass - for the 40 or 60 optics companies out there that the same isnt true for binos as well. Until convinced otherwise I am going to assume that it is true,
 
Swarovski Habicht series. 8x30W, 7x42GA or 10x40GA.

Alpha views and high light transmission than any roof prism bino.

Amazing piece of optical equipment that you will hand down to your grandson.

Apart from updated lens coating they are virtually unchanged from when they were first made in 1946.
To have higher light transmission than roof prism binos in such an old design speaks volumes for the porro prism system.

If they bothered to modernise a porro prism then they would absolutely blow away any bino out there for half the cost.
That right there is why they don't do it. People line up to pay multiple $K for the latest and greatest.
 
that I can not participate now in discussion - there is no free time. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.
 
Swarovski Habicht series. 8x30W, 7x42GA or 10x40GA.

Alpha views and high light transmission than any roof prism bino.

Amazing piece of optical equipment that you will hand down to your grandson.

Apart from updated lens coating they are virtually unchanged from when they were first made in 1946.
To have higher light transmission than roof prism binos in such an old design speaks volumes for the porro prism system.

If they bothered to modernise a porro prism then they would absolutely blow away any bino out there for half the cost.
That right there is why they don't do it. People line up to pay multiple $K for the latest and greatest.

Porros are definitely underrated. They just tend to be tight on eye relief and a little bulky. Not really an issue if you don't wear glasses and aren't trying to stuff them into a chest harness.
 
I have both the 7x42GA and 10x40GA Habicht's and they are more compact and ergonomic than one might think. I made my own chest pouch for them out of neoprene and it works really well
 
Back
Top