The relationship between environmental temps and what we do/how we handle the meat in the first 24 hours especially, I think is a somewhat misunderstood thing and more nuanced than many of us were typically taught.
Let me say off the top that I am personally hyper invested in the quality of my final product: tenderness, flavor, etc. Like my pride and ego is involved when I serve it to guests, and I get a little obsessive. But just so you know where I'm coming from with this business. I gotta be me. And you do you.
Of course, erring on the side of too warm can ruin meat entirely, whereas erring on the side of too cold (i.e. you allowed cold-shortening to occur) won't make you sick or rot the meat, but it will be so permanently tough and flavorless I would personally probably end up feeding it to the dogs.
(to review: "
cold shortening [is] when the meat, still in its pre-rigor phase, reaches temperatures of 50°F or lower. These conditions cause irreversible contractions of the muscle tissue which toughen the meat even after prolonged ripening."
In the first 18 hours or so, depending on conditions, I'm thinking about the meat cooling too rapidly, and to too low of a temperature (cold-shortening). I am also thinking about the meat cooling too slowly, or holding at "too high" of a temp. I put too high in quotes because this is one area I think there is nuance and context lost in a lot of discussions.
For elk, I start thinking about
moderating heat loss if overnight temperatures are below 32F. I start thinking about
encouraging heat loss if overnight temps are holding above, say 50F. Again, this is for elk, with their thick hair and large body mass.
In a commercial/industrial setting, there are competing priorities between food safety/efficiency on the one hand, and the actual tenderness and max awesomeness of the final product on the other. Generally, more is given up on the latter, in order to ensure the former. And I think this is partly what informs our ideas and attitudes around this subject. From an
article on carcass chilling published in the journal Meat Science:
Most postmortem chilling processes of livestock carcasses are primarily employed to ensure food safety, maximize shelf-life, and reduce shrinkage with less emphasis on maintaining tenderness and color factors of the finished product. Whether chilling conditions are being met for regulatory requirements, as part of a critical control point of a HACCP system...other factors may be more important than those factors effecting direct consumer satisfaction of the product.
But meat scientists know that in an ideal world, beef, lamb, venison, (pigs are a little different) etc, should experience what is termed "delayed chilling." We would "[employ] chilling parameters that minimize cold shortening" as a matter "of greatest importance and [which] can be best addressed by ensuring that muscle temperatures are not below 10 °C [50°F]" during this critical time-frame (i.e. while rigor mortis is developing and then relaxing, i.e. the first 6-24 hours)
In small critters like rabbits rigor begins and concludes rapidly, within a few hours. Deer will take longer. Elk, moose, even longer still. It is body mass and temperature-dependent (as well as dependent on other variables like if the animal
full of adrenaline before it died.)
So, to repeat, Ideally rigor mortis is allowed to develop—and then relax—normally, at moderate temperatures of between 50-60F. (After the first 18 hours or so—where I'm perfectly happy if it spent that time between 50-60F—my elk quarters spend the rest of their hanging/aging period between 35-50F. By this point they're at home in my shed if the temps are correct or in my friend's walk-in cooler. Lower temps, they would hang longer, 7-14 days. If temps were flirting with 50, then they would have a shorter hang, maybe just 5 days, it depends.)
What does this mean for me post-shot? Well I personally don't want to stay up past midnight if I don't have to, and I've never had to. I like my sleep and I'm a morning person.
Elk:
If shot in the day I do gutless and pack out as normal.
If shot just before dark, with typical hunting season overnight temps of 25-45F, I'll gut the animal and I have no issue with propping the body cavity open for air flow and leaving the carcass overnight. If overnight temps are at the lower end of that scale, or even lower, then I'm actually glad for the hide and the moderating effect it provides slowing heat loss.
(1,000% you do not want to leave the guts in the animal for any longer than necessary. That is where the bacteria are, and decomposition begins immediately upon death. People referred to gasses yup and other leakage as well—plus it retains a ton of heat. Too much heat. And mostly just a f-ton of bacteria with all the ideal conditions to reproduce exponentially.)
If it was going to be warmer than 50F all night maybe I'd skin back one half and remove that shoulder, hindquarter and backstrap, miscellaneous meat. Again, just air flow. Finding that goldilocks zone of "not too much not too little, not too rapid, not too slow" heat loss.
This is all for clean kills too btw. All bets would be off for a gut/paunch-shot animal. In that case, bacteria is no longer contained in the GI tract. I would quarter and cool an animal like that ASAP. I'm actually not sure how I would handle hanging/aging such an animal, as I haven't had that experience. Anyone who has, please chime in on how that meat turned out. Please school me.
But anyway the muscle meat of a cleanly taken critter is basically sterile to begin with. I'm happy to make elk tartar or carpaccio with prime cuts.