Take on Forms Scope Test from Aaron Davidson

Sako300

WKR
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
770
Anyone listen to the last Rokcast Podcast with Aaron Davidson where he was saying he was seeing measurable movements in picatinny mounted scopes with rifle drops? I thought this was interesting. I wonder how Nightforce, Trijicon, SWFA, etc continue to pass?
 
There's already another thread on it.

Actually looks like the one I was thinking of was a Cliff Gray podcast.

 
Anyone listen to the last Rokcast Podcast with Aaron Davidson where he was saying he was seeing measurable movements in picatinny mounted scopes with rifle drops? I thought this was interesting. I wonder how Nightforce, Trijicon, SWFA, etc continue to pass?

I listened to the podcast and he has very valid points on many topics in terms of long range precision, rifle design, optics, etc.

Picatinny definitely has a lot of slop and you can feel it when you tighten the rings when putting pressure forward to secure the scope. I think the system was designed for a different purpose (flexible attaching of military optics and accessories in field conditions) and not ultimate precision. A simple Sako tapered dovetail seems more precise and solid in general vs. any picatinny I've used just as one example.

A scope shifting 1/1000 of an inch in the mount is going to move the point of impact 1" at 100 yards. It takes very little shift to cause a major miss if a mount isn't secure.

With the above said, some of these drop tests have shifts so bad and dialing errors so bad that I find it hard to believe it's just a mount moving.
 
Back
Top