Swaro ATX vs ATS

Toaster42

FNG
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
37
I'm looking at upgrading my spotting scope from a Gen 1 Razor to something from the Big 3 (Leica, Zeiss, Swaro.) I've been looking mainly at Swaro's and I'm just wondering what the differences are in the ATX system versus the ATS?
 
They are both great glass. The atx is their newer modular system which allows you to change the objective lens with the eyepiece and vice versa. The glass on the atx is slightly better in my opinion but you will probably notice less difference between the atx and ats than between the razor and ats.
 
The modularity of the X’s is a big deal if you sometimes want a smaller or larger scope. The eyepiece is a lot more forgiving on the “X” spotters in my opinion. Not as critical to be in the perfect spot to see a full image. I used the ATS 20-50 x 65 a few weeks ago and found it to be somewhat underwhelming after using the X’s almost exclusively for the past few years.

It’s a great little scope, I’ve just been spoiled by packing the bigger objectives for most of my hunts.

Coop


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
ATX is fantastic glass, I love mine. But if you don't need/want the modularity option, I'd suggest there are better options. A Kowa 883 is cheaper/lighter then an ATX/65, yet IMO it can compete against the ATX/95.
 
Thanks, after doing some research on Kowa I'm definitely leaning towards an 883. I never would have looked at kowa without the advice from this post, can't thank you guys enough!
Please feel free to give us a call, 516-217-1000, and we can discuss the Kowa with you
 
Have compared both and owned both I only noticed 5-10 min more light in X than ats. I thought ats 25-50 eyepiece was more forgiving personally. Right now I’m comparing Leica 65 vs swaro x and it’s a tossup. Like ergos on swaro and mag but I think Leica has better clarity and color personally
 
Back
Top