Stone Glacier Grumman jacket and pants

LeeB

FNG
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
30
Looking to get the Grumman jacket and pants for late October-November elk and mule deer hunts in Colorado and Montana. Anyone have any experience with this gear they can share? Just joined they page! Thanks in advance!!
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
1,007
I've used mine for sheep hunts as well as spring ice fishing trips. I really like it so far. I've had it out in mild sprinkles and it handled the water just fine. If you throw a set of rain gear over it, you're good to go for quite awhile sitting still in cooler temperatures. If you're going to be sitting for extended periods, you'll probably want even more insulation, but for packing and on the go hunting, with an hour or two sitting, it works extremely well.
 
OP
LeeB

LeeB

FNG
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
30
I've used mine for sheep hunts as well as spring ice fishing trips. I really like it so far. I've had it out in mild sprinkles and it handled the water just fine. If you throw a set of rain gear over it, you're good to go for quite awhile sitting still in cooler temperatures. If you're going to be sitting for extended periods, you'll probably want even more insulation, but for packing and on the go hunting, with an hour or two sitting, it works extremely well.
I've used mine for sheep hunts as well as spring ice fishing trips. I really like it so far. I've had it out in mild sprinkles and it handled the water just fine. If you throw a set of rain gear over it, you're good to go for quite awhile sitting still in cooler temperatures. If you're going to be sitting for extended periods, you'll probably want even more insulation, but for packing and on the go hunting, with an hour or two sitting, it works extremely well.
Thanks for the input. I was thinking of carrying a kelvin lite vest as well if it was gonna be real cold.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
1,007
Yeah, you could push the Grumman to pretty cool temperatures, especially if you layer up under it with a good base layer and lighter fleece. One of my favorite fleeces is the Patagucci R1 Hoodie....The thing just works and works extremely well at a variety of things. Those micro grid fleece layers help let heat channel around for me. If you had a poncho to toss over everything, you could hunker down for a long time in one spot.
 
OP
LeeB

LeeB

FNG
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
30
That’s kinda what I was thinking. I’ve got a lot of good gear just trying to lighten up my pack and about the only place I have left to cut is my insulation system.
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
8,065
Location
S. UTAH
 
OP
LeeB

LeeB

FNG
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
30
Ordered my Grumman a bit ago!!! After all the reviews I just don’t think you can go a better route.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,126
Have used the Grumman jacket and pants the last two years. From minus 14 degrees upward, some heavy snowstorms and a couple of soaks.

qDBACj2.png



Instead of saying things like “it’s an oven”, or “it’s like the surface of the sun”, etc. instead treat it like a sleeping bag. No real puff outfit is made to move in. They are static layers. The way I see it is to find out what is the temperature that allows absolute comfort (sitting on your couch watching TV comfort) with ZERO movement, while keeping feet, head, hands warm to avoid that variable.

Wearing a thin base layer (think Patagonia lvl 1), a lighter weight fleece (Patagonia R1), the puff jacket, and a wind blocker with no movement for several hours- The Grumman is around a 35 degree jacket/pants. This is across multiple people in varied weather. Very few were good down to 30 degrees, and a couple were good only to around 38-40 degrees. The majority had to start doing something to stay warm- slight shivering, rubbing arms, little movement, etc., below 35.

If you move at all it throws everything out of wack. With just a bit of very slow hiking, several were overheated in below zero temps. It’s why a comparison of warmth when movement whatsoever is involved is nearly useless without a detailed description of personal body heat and metabolism, temperature and activity, boots, socks, head gear, etc.
 

novcie870

WKR
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
460
Location
Idaho
Have used the Grumman jacket and pants the last two years. From minus 14 degrees upward, some heavy snowstorms and a couple of soaks.

qDBACj2.png



Instead of saying things like “it’s an oven”, or “it’s like the surface of the sun”, etc. instead treat it like a sleeping bag. No real puff outfit is made to move in. They are static layers. The way I see it is to find out what is the temperature that allows absolute comfort (sitting on your couch watching TV comfort) with ZERO movement, while keeping feet, head, hands warm to avoid that variable.

Wearing a thin base layer (think Patagonia lvl 1), a lighter weight fleece (Patagonia R1), the puff jacket, and a wind blocker with no movement for several hours- The Grumman is around a 35 degree jacket/pants. This is across multiple people in varied weather. Very few were good down to 30 degrees, and a couple were good only to around 38-40 degrees. The majority had to start doing something to stay warm- slight shivering, rubbing arms, little movement, etc., below 35.

If you move at all it throws everything out of wack. With just a bit of very slow hiking, several were overheated in below zero temps. It’s why a comparison of warmth when movement whatsoever is involved is nearly useless without a detailed description of personal body heat and metabolism, temperature and activity, boots, socks, head gear, etc.

Such good insight!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TheUgly

FNG
Joined
Aug 17, 2019
Messages
48
Location
Minnesota
Have used the Grumman jacket and pants the last two years. From minus 14 degrees upward, some heavy snowstorms and a couple of soaks.

qDBACj2.png



Instead of saying things like “it’s an oven”, or “it’s like the surface of the sun”, etc. instead treat it like a sleeping bag. No real puff outfit is made to move in. They are static layers. The way I see it is to find out what is the temperature that allows absolute comfort (sitting on your couch watching TV comfort) with ZERO movement, while keeping feet, head, hands warm to avoid that variable.

Wearing a thin base layer (think Patagonia lvl 1), a lighter weight fleece (Patagonia R1), the puff jacket, and a wind blocker with no movement for several hours- The Grumman is around a 35 degree jacket/pants. This is across multiple people in varied weather. Very few were good down to 30 degrees, and a couple were good only to around 38-40 degrees. The majority had to start doing something to stay warm- slight shivering, rubbing arms, little movement, etc., below 35.

If you move at all it throws everything out of wack. With just a bit of very slow hiking, several were overheated in below zero temps. It’s why a comparison of warmth when movement whatsoever is involved is nearly useless without a detailed description of personal body heat and metabolism, temperature and activity, boots, socks, head gear, etc.

What jacket/pants have you seen users be comfortable wearing in true cold weather hunting scenarios? I'm talking in temps ranging from -5* to 15* where they spend hours with no movement. What fill weight/insulation type works best in those ranges?

Last season I hunted northern MN and temps averaged 10* during the day and routinely went below 0* at night while camping out. I wore a pair of ECWCS lvl7 pants and a Jottnar Fjorm jacket (layered over Capeline lvl1 and R1 fleece) and they both kept me warm while in staying static for a couple hours at a time (the only weak spot being my feet), but the pants are bulky and don't compress nearly as well as down.

I've looked for pants that offer a similar fill weight as the Fjorm jacket (~10oz) and the closest I've found are these ones from Goose Feet Gear which go up to 8.5oz. Have you had a chance to check those out?
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,126
What jacket/pants have you seen users be comfortable wearing in true cold weather hunting scenarios? I'm talking in temps ranging from -5* to 15* where they spend hours with no movement. What fill weight/insulation type works best in those ranges?


Below zero and static... Arctyrx COLD WX SVX Parka and Bibs.

The ECWS Lvl 7 set with under clothing that I described is around a 15-20 degree system when brand new. It loses loft relatively quickly.

For zero degree truly static use with thin base layer and mid weight fleece, and total comfort, it is about 15 ounces of high quality down in the jacket, and again for the pants. The Goose gear looks good but it isn’t warm enough for zero degrees. This past year to reach those temperatures I wore a silk weight base layer top and bottom, Sitka Kelvin Active top, SG Grumman jacket, FL Chamberlin, and then a Goretex layer. For bottoms I had the aforementioned thin base layer, SG De Havilland pants, thin synthetic puff pants, SG Grumman puff pants, and the PCU Lvl 7 pants.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
1,895
Location
El Dorado HIlls
Have used the Grumman jacket and pants the last two years. From minus 14 degrees upward, some heavy snowstorms and a couple of soaks.

qDBACj2.png



Instead of saying things like “it’s an oven”, or “it’s like the surface of the sun”, etc. instead treat it like a sleeping bag. No real puff outfit is made to move in. They are static layers. The way I see it is to find out what is the temperature that allows absolute comfort (sitting on your couch watching TV comfort) with ZERO movement, while keeping feet, head, hands warm to avoid that variable.

Wearing a thin base layer (think Patagonia lvl 1), a lighter weight fleece (Patagonia R1), the puff jacket, and a wind blocker with no movement for several hours- The Grumman is around a 35 degree jacket/pants. This is across multiple people in varied weather. Very few were good down to 30 degrees, and a couple were good only to around 38-40 degrees. The majority had to start doing something to stay warm- slight shivering, rubbing arms, little movement, etc., below 35.

If you move at all it throws everything out of wack. With just a bit of very slow hiking, several were overheated in below zero temps. It’s why a comparison of warmth when movement whatsoever is involved is nearly useless without a detailed description of personal body heat and metabolism, temperature and activity, boots, socks, head gear, etc.

Whats your take on down vs synthetic for a backpack hunt? Meaning taking into account times you are wet from sweat or rain and need to throw on puffy to preserve heat. I know SG just did a re-warming drill with their down garments, but people like John Barklow of Sitka say using down in a backcountry situation isn't wise.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,126
Whats your take on down vs synthetic for a backpack hunt? Meaning taking into account times you are wet from sweat or rain and need to throw on puffy to preserve heat. I know SG just did a re-warming drill with their down garments, but people like John Barklow of Sitka say using down in a backcountry situation isn't wise.


It wasn’t long ago that I agreed with him. The SG treated down works. I would still choose synthetic if I was hunting in SE Alaska, Coast of WA and OR, N. ID early seasons, etc., where I knew I would be wet constantly or where durability is a serious concern. However for later season hunts and most of the Rocky Mountain west, down (at least SG) has proven to work very well, drying relatively quickly even if it gets wet, while being warmer and lighter.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
1,007
Agree with Formidilosus totally on this. If you're going to be in 100% humid areas with lots of rain, synthetics that are durable are tough to beat. Treated down will work for awhile, but eventually, the stuff has to air out and get that moisture away from the fibers. Down doesn't do that after continual exposure to wet stuff, even if you're body heat is trying to move it away from the fibers. Down will continue to go downhill fast once it starts to saturate. That's a prime case where hypothermia can rear its ugly head.
 
OP
LeeB

LeeB

FNG
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
30
Well I received my Grumman jacket size XL yesterday! I am very happy with everything. Quality looks great,fit is spot on,and it weighs nothing I weighed it with stuff sack and the booklet of tags attached and it was 14 ounces so with the tags off it should be the 13.8 that they claim!! Fabric is very quite for a puffy. Note for size,I’m 5’10” 210 athletic build big arms big chest big shoulders and the xl fits perfectly with plenty of room for layers.
 

sneaky

"DADDY"
Joined
Feb 1, 2014
Messages
10,113
Location
ID
What jacket/pants have you seen users be comfortable wearing in true cold weather hunting scenarios? I'm talking in temps ranging from -5* to 15* where they spend hours with no movement. What fill weight/insulation type works best in those ranges?

Last season I hunted northern MN and temps averaged 10* during the day and routinely went below 0* at night while camping out. I wore a pair of ECWCS lvl7 pants and a Jottnar Fjorm jacket (layered over Capeline lvl1 and R1 fleece) and they both kept me warm while in staying static for a couple hours at a time (the only weak spot being my feet), but the pants are bulky and don't compress nearly as well as down.

I've looked for pants that offer a similar fill weight as the Fjorm jacket (~10oz) and the closest I've found are these ones from Goose Feet Gear which go up to 8.5oz. Have you had a chance to check those out?
Take a look at the Kobuk or Torre parka, and Kobuk pants from Nunatak. XL Kobuk has 12oz of 900fp down and you can have overfill added to your specs, treated or untreated down is available. The Torre is warmer than the Kobuk but they don't list the fill weight chart on it. Materials range from 10d up to 40d for the shell, custom sleeve and torso lengths available as well. Pricey, but made exactly how you want. @White Mamba is the one he made this one for I believe.
05d49fcf1c8cc79eac4c089ddfe0b1ca.jpg


Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

p3t3rsn

FNG
Joined
Apr 18, 2020
Messages
20
Below zero and static... Arctyrx COLD WX SVX Parka and Bibs....
Form, is the Arcteryx COLD WX SVX Parka and Bib fairly quiet? Being made of a nylon weave I am concerned about the noise. For the thick woods hunting I do, to have a deer come within a few feet is not uncommon so noise is a concern. Last year I was tree standing hunting in -30C (-22F) with strong winds and I frozen in my Sitka Fanatic jack and bids after about 2 hours of being motionless. The Arcteryx system sounds like just the ticket if quiet.
 

Formidilosus

Super Moderator
Shoot2HuntU
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
10,126
Form, is the Arcteryx COLD WX SVX Parka and Bib fairly quiet? Being made of a nylon weave I am concerned about the noise. For the thick woods hunting I do, to have a deer come within a few feet is not uncommon so noise is a concern. Last year I was tree standing hunting in -30C (-22F) with strong winds and I frozen in my Sitka Fanatic jack and bids after about 2 hours of being motionless. The Arcteryx system sounds like just the ticket if quiet.


No, not in the way bow hunters want. It’s about like a US ECWS puff jacket, or most soft shells from hiking companies.
 

Latest posts

Featured Video

Stats

Threads
349,817
Messages
3,685,385
Members
80,018
Latest member
typicalmuley
Top