I like this idea, it would be sweet to have the area forward of the mag to a point machined as arca. My concern would be if it broke, you are solHow much of a challenge/annoyance is it for you that bolt stops, ejection ports, etc differ so much between custom R700 clones? Mainly in regards to the aesthetics of how the stock matches up with the action.
Would it be a pain in the ass to inlet for trigger hangers such as the Impact ones to the point it's not worth it?
With the MDT Hnt26 as an example of this (I think?) have you considered machining integral ARCA sections into the forearms of your CF stocks? Or is there a difference in the kind of materials in how the Hnt26 chassis did that? Theoretically of course, since I think the jury's out on the durability of that integral ARCA section for the Hnt26. I guess the question could also be generalized into "how do you see the expanded adoption of ARCA rails/accessories influencing your stocks in the near-term?"
I guess that last one isn't inletting so I might just be lost in my own head but it still relates to the machining of the stock so I figured why not ask.
The widespread adoption of ARCA in the LR shooting and hunting communities must be a big deal for stock/chassis makers. A few chassis makers already machine in integral ARCA rails since they're dealing with metal anyway. But I also imagine it has influenced some of the traditional stockmakers to widen/flatten/straighten their forends as well.I like this idea, it would be sweet to have the area forward of the mag to a point machined as arca. My concern would be if it broke, you are sol
It is only an annoyance on the engineering side. Each custom 700 action does have different ejection ports and bolt handle cuts so it takes a lot of time to create those CNC files to accommodate it. We don’t have a large engineering department so our priorities are to do new models and new inlets. We are expanding that department so we can get these slight inlet differences dialed in and offered to the retail public. But it’s never been high on the list because of all the other projects we have constantly going on, especially when a gunsmith or even a individual who knows how to use a file/dremel can get it done.How much of a challenge/annoyance is it for you that bolt stops, ejection ports, etc differ so much between custom R700 clones? Mainly in regards to the aesthetics of how the stock matches up with the action.
Would it be a pain in the ass to inlet for trigger hangers such as the Impact ones to the point it's not worth it?
With the MDT Hnt26 as an example of this (I think?) have you considered machining integral ARCA sections into the forearms of your CF stocks? Or is there a difference in the kind of materials in how the Hnt26 chassis did that? Theoretically of course, since I think the jury's out on the durability of that integral ARCA section for the Hnt26. I guess the question could also be generalized into "how do you see the expanded adoption of ARCA rails/accessories influencing your stocks in the near-term?"
I guess that last one isn't inletting so I might just be lost in my own head but it still relates to the machining of the stock so I figured why not ask.
There isn’t a concern for the integrity of the stock if it’s minor since the bedding block material extends all the way to the carbon shell.When minor sanding is needed for an action to fit, what concerns are there? Best technique to sand?
That's really cool and I look forward to seeing how it goes. Has the widespread adoption of ARCA caused you to flatten/straighten/widen the forends of some stocks? For some models I imagine it's in your head of "people are going to want to put a rail on this".We have that exact plan on the list to tackle this summer. We see the demand for it and we just have to put it through the development stage.
Yes which is why we came out with the ST5 and the VGH 700That's really cool and I look forward to seeing how it goes. Has the widespread adoption of ARCA caused you to flatten/straighten/widen the forends of some stocks? For some models I imagine it's in your head of "people are going to want to put a rail on this".
No new updates. We already did the preliminary files last year so once we’re done with the Winchester 70 stocks that should be next to come out. And it shouldn’t take very long since we already did the hard part.Any update on xbolt inlets since the last podcast?
We would just need to know which one you’re using.What particular measurements would you or someone at UM need for the trigger hanger inletting?
It is only an annoyance on the engineering side. Each custom 700 action does have different ejection ports and bolt handle cuts so it takes a lot of time to create those CNC files to accommodate it. We don’t have a large engineering department so our priorities are to do new models and new inlets. We are expanding that department so we can get these slight inlet differences dialed in and offered to the retail public. But it’s never been high on the list because of all the other projects we have constantly going on, especially when a gunsmith or even a individual who knows how to use a file/dremel can get it done.
Yes they will work with little to no fitting. The main difference is they use a side bolt release whereas a true Remington action has the bolt release right infront of the trigger. We do make our 700 stocks fit the top bolt release so you don’t have to worry about fitting that.Will the rem 700 stocks work with a Christensen Arms? How much modification would it take?