My error, I was referring to T-Stick's post rather than the OP. My discussion remains otherwise unchanged.What are you talking about? The person I responded to is not the OP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My error, I was referring to T-Stick's post rather than the OP. My discussion remains otherwise unchanged.What are you talking about? The person I responded to is not the OP.
My error, I was referring to T-Stick's post rather than the OP. My discussion remains otherwise unchanged.
This is your problem. All you are seeing is the reality of insufficient shot group sizes. 3 shot groups is not real data. Your 10 plus shot groups at 100 yards will be your 10 plus shot groups at 300 yards (excepting wind).
If you are happy with those groups that is all that matters. I would not be happy with those outliers.
You keep avoiding what I really said in order to promote your original strawman assumption. I use multiple 3 shoot groups to establish accuracy benchmarks in a sporter hunting rifle. Or sometimes I will slow fire another 2 after the barrel cools. I also mentioned the importance of establishing consistent 1st round hits. I also was saying all this in hunting context, not benchrest context. The Speer Impact are hunting bullets.
The groups you posted would not inspire me to change my methodology. I would still be trying to tune those loads for better accuracy.