- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,026
My error, I was referring to T-Stick's post rather than the OP. My discussion remains otherwise unchanged.
I don’t know what your point or “discussion” is. You seem to want to argue semantics rather than cut straight to the issue.
This is what I initially wrote to T-Stick who thinks that because his groups are hovering around +/- 1 MOA at 100 and 300 yards- well within expected variability of 3 shot group sizes; that the bullets are unstable, imbalanced, or inconsistent due to bonding.
This is your problem. All you are seeing is the reality of insufficient shot group sizes. 3 shot groups is not real data. Your 10 plus shot groups at 100 yards will be your 10 plus shot groups at 300 yards (excepting wind).
There is nothing in there that is incorrect- 3 shot groups are not real data. That means useful to determine what he is trying to determine. In context, 3 shot groups are insufficient shot group sizes- As stated.