Isn’t that map showing the percent normal, for this time of year? IE you could still catch up pretty quick with some good late stormsThe Forest Service did a pretty in-depth study some years back looking into better forecasting fire seasons. Previous to this study the number one predictor they used was snowpack, now the number one predictor is June precipitation. Obviously snowpack still plays a major role, as does Spring precip, but a very wet June can make up for at least some of that lost ground.
Amazingly our snowpack was even worse off before our near record cold snap, probably a good 10-20% lower than what it is now. My guess is that snow was probably lacking a little in the moisture department.
got our own in-house hydrologist @Josh Boyd scheduled on the Rokcast to air 1/29. We be talking all this.There are a few bright spots, but a lot of the West not looking good we may be in the worst shape. Our 10 day forecast shows little to no additional precip- not good.
Isn’t that map showing the percent normal, for this time of year? IE you could still catch up pretty quick with some good late storms
got our own in-house hydrologist @Josh Boyd scheduled on the Rokcast to air 1/29. We be talking all this.
Those maps are based on the median SWE (snow water equivalent) of the snowpack compared to the 1991-2020 median values. You can click on each individual site to see how it compares in graphical form with previous years. There is a TON of cool data stored within the Snotel databasesIsn’t that map showing the percent normal, for this time of year? IE you could still catch up pretty quick with some good late storms
I follow a few different versions. Just not sure what provides the most relevant info for keeping tabs on the overall conditions for mule deer. Locally we are “out of the drought” but I can tell you we had late fall precipitation and late green up which is not great for my local deer herd. Obviously the snotel data was pretty spot on predicting last years winter kill. All interesting stuff.Those maps are based on the median SWE (snow water equivalent) of the snowpack compared to the 1991-2020 median values. You can click on each individual site to see how it compares in graphical form with previous years. There is a TON of cool data stored within the Snotel databases
To answer your question, yes, we can catch up. In MT I believe late February-April are our big SWE storing months.
I mean, "conditions for mule deer" is incredibly complicated and far exceeds 1-yr of precip data. You'd need to know vegetative conditions and structure, browse quality, browse patterns over time, historical logging, fire, etc etc.I follow a few different versions. Just not sure what provides the most relevant info for keeping tabs on the overall conditions for mule deer. Locally we are “out of the drought” but I can tell you we had late fall precipitation and late green up which is not great for my local deer herd. Obviously the snotel data was pretty spot on predicting last years winter kill. All interesting stuff.
Keep in mind that this is SWE so 10 inches of heavy wet snow can have a higher SWE than 100 inches of light snow.I'm surprised it's as high as it is in SW Montana, thought it would be way lower. Lot's of season to go but it's been a light precip year for sure.
Hopefully it will improve in November.Add it to the list of things that take a turn for the worst in 2024.
I wonder when we'll finally hear some good news?