Small caliber regret

Are you drunk?
Not directing this at you, and certainly not directing it at John. At all. I respect both of you and I mean that and I hate these squabbles.

But some years ago on another forum I noticed a very predictable pattern that posters who were friendly and helpful during the day or week, would get really opinionated at night or on weekends, and eventually I was able to put together that 'drunk posting' really is a thing, and it usually isn't the extreme can't-type-anymore pathetic drunk (I've seen that too), it's the guy who's had 4-5 drinks and is flying high and feeling no pain, who is the worst offender.
 
went hog hunting in georgia once with a 223, never again. shoulda killed like 7 hogs but only got 3 or 4 i think and had to shoot some of those multiple times, and watched a 350-400 hog take a 223 bullet to the shoulder and walk off like i had slapped him on the ass, lol

What bullet we’re you using?
 
After I saw the fist sized hole my 6CM made in an elk, my only regret is not being able to hunt with 22cal in my state. Now I have to figure out if my other gun gets rebarreled to a fast 6 wildcat or a 16" downloaded featherweight 6CM... choices choices.
Don’t be boringggggg. At least go 6PRC 🙌🏻

Yeah man. My 22 Creeds really do pretty much obsolete my 6 creeds and 243s. I need to jump up to a fast 6.5 to really gain any killing advantage.

But I did just kill a big game animal with a 308 so obviously I’m still not that cool.
.308?! Ewwwwww lol
 
My dad's voice is bouncing through my head in reading this. He has a way of being really abrasive and sometimes funny in pointing out "obvious" truths one of us is missing. He also always hammered home the fundamentals of stalking and getting in close when I was a kid, with wind, tracking, route-planning, etc.

So, a couple of years ago I was talking about wanting to take a long-range class and be able to take animals out to 600 or 700 yards or so. And he just says, "Or, you know, you could just be a better hunter."

That kinda stung.

But I still want to be able to get to 600 with absolute reliability. That long-range stuff you guys do is like voodoo to me.

600 is still a pretty long poke on game.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
A lot of fluff is online about how every elk or deer is as easy to kill, and that’s just not correct unless you believe every animal will turn for a good angle. If you mind waiting for good shooting angles within the limitation of the cartridge/bullet then sure, use the smallest thing that will kill it if you want to. For most of my adult life I’ve enjoyed focusing on antler or horn size and early on had a tremendous mulie just walk into the trees because the shot angle was outside of the limitations of the rifle. Since then I will never feel under gunned trophy hunting with a 7 mag or larger since I’ve already paid the price once for carrying a less capable combination. Real life comes with a lot of less than ideal situations.

Are you really willing to pass up a big deer or elk at an angle like this? Nothing wrong with your answer either way, but more than once I’ve seen first hand how big talk about shooting ethics go out the window quickly. (Cue the dude saying he shoots everything at 500 yards in the neck and has never lost an animal, or a 223 would easily kill it.)

View attachment 961987
Hate to admit it but yes in rare cases I’ve taken that shot, only on wounded animals that were going to escape and needed to go down NOW.

25 creedmoor and 134 eldm, about 8 days ago in Idaho. Somebody else had shot and broken the front leg of a little forky, they were a ridge behind and no chance for a shot, deer was about to make it into some steep timber. Poor buck looked terrified, bloody, front leg flopping..

Tried to shoot him in the back of the head but hit him in the ass. Exploded his femur/socket. Dropped right there, deer had bled to death by the time I ran up there likely from femoral artery.

So, yes I’d rather have a heavy for caliber frangible bullet for these shots. IMO a bonded bullet making it to the lungs from there, essentially poking a small hole…in one lung if any…that is not a recipe for success. Exploding a ham will kill or maim enough for follow up.

No im not proud of the meat loss or situation but it felt necessary at the time.IMG_6368.jpegIMG_6366.jpeg

IMG_6367.jpeg


The opposite situation was a buck my buddy shot with his 7mag and a hornady GMX. About 350 yards, hard quartering. Bullet went in behind the ribs and stopped in the opposing front shoulder. Perfect shot no?

Buck ran 1.75 miles in a big loop onto private. I luckily found him bedded in the sage brush. Took several hours to get landowner and game warden involved. Finally got permission to kill him. Shot at sunrise, got to him about 2pm, still very much alive, tried to run, finished him off and were shocked at the “perfect” hard quartering shot placement and the very much alive deer. Small hole through liver, diaphragm, mostly single lung.

So yeah for marginal/hard quartering shots the right answer is probably don’t shoot, but if I have to, I want explosive not deep penetrating.
 
I’ve had double-lung shot deer run 400 yards after being hit by .30-06 and .45-70. Does that mean I need a bigger bullet?
What bullet in the 45-70? I find that hard to believe(but not impossible) after the shots I've seen, but all of the ones I've shot with 45-70 have been the Hornady 325grn FTX Leverevolution's. One buck made it 100yds, two made it 40yds, the remaining 15+ deer DRT.
 
What bullet in the 45-70? I find that hard to believe(but not impossible) after the shots I've seen, but all of the ones I've shot with 45-70 have been the Hornady 325grn FTX Leverevolution's. One buck made it 100yds, two made it 40yds, the remaining 15+ deer DRT.

The factory Remington 300-grain semi-jacketed hollow point at 1900 FPS muzzle velocity.

The point is not that the .45-70 is a bad cartridge or that it is a bad bullet, it’s that in a large enough sample size, you will see some outcomes that fall at either end of the bell curve.
 
Again- it’s very simple: How many shots at that angle have you taken on animals? How many were recovered? With what calibers, bullets and impact velocity?
Maybe 10-15 , all DRT, in North America, 240wm - 300win with good bonded bullet. 60-200 yards
On cape & Nile buffalo 300gr swift A frame.375 80-100 meters ( it’s game on and shoot till it dies)
Your the “ expert” so you figure out the different FPS @ those distance and different caliber
 
The factory Remington 300-grain semi-jacketed hollow point at 1900 FPS muzzle velocity.

The point is not that the .45-70 is a bad cartridge or that it is a bad bullet, it’s that in a large enough sample size, you will see some outcomes that fall at either end of the bell curve.
I agree
 
I hope every single poster in this thread has a chance to get out in the woods this weekend. Breathe some fresh air, maybe pull your boots off around camp and touch some grass with your bare feet, and let all this caliber stuff go.

Won't be in the woods for another week and a half, but I did go out this morning to verify the riffel I'll be using and it shoots the same as it did the last time I used it (I think) 5 years ago now. Two shot distances at 300 and 390 yds.
 
So, you think a 100 gr 6mm Ballistic tip is more deadly than a 25 cal 115 gr Ballistic tip going faster? That’s pretty simple, but you get in a bunch arguing something completely different.
.242 vs .249 sd same construction, didn’t look up bc, assume the higher sd and velocity makes it pretty obvious there’s some advantages but recoil isn’t one, and the advantages may not be noticeable on game terminally at all until maybe further distances as the one will get to for same impact velocity...

Now throw the 108 eldm against it with .261 sd and likely far better bc and you wash all that recoil away and watch more happen in scope and have higher penetration potential and hit probability will catch the 115 at some point then walk away from it from there onward, again with a better penetrating bullet

And nothing of the headstamp or diameter matters. Only the bullet numbers, construction, and velocity.

Gotta stop looking at this from a headstamp perspective, total waste of time. It’s just the decider of what case needs to behind what bullet to get as far as you want it to go for min impact velocity. Choose bullet first then figure the rest out after. Always.

Easy to find ‘marginal’ on larger class game if you choose the wrong formula, it’s just easier to choose the wrong formula with smaller hp older cartridges which generally load with marginal bullets for game intended. Put right bullet in them and no longer marginal. It’s a numbers and construction thing, enough sd with rapid expansion construction for game intended.
 
Back
Top