Simple physics accounts for the torque/rotation. As any SB blade cuts through any media, the cutting and movement results in greater lateral pressure against the bevel side vs the flat side. The tougher and more resistant the media, the greater the pressure against the bevel. That pressure encourages the bevel to move away from the resistance. Try cutting straight down through a block of cheese with a significant SB blade and you'll notice the blade travels in a curving fashion away from the bevel side.
A SB head has at least 2 cutting edges. It cuts through forward movement combined with a tapered overall design. It travels horizontally through the media but the tapered design results in progressive cutting along the length of the blade. As cutting occurs, the effect of the single bevel (per edge) shows up...but it is augmented by having multiple edges...as in a 2 blade or 3 blade head. Each blade edge adds to the torque/rotational effect. The more resistant the media, the more force it exerts on the blades...whether we can actually see it happen or not.
That said, I have no personal belief the S cut is a major advantage in soft tissue. It proves rotation exists but doesn't prove additional overall wound severity and faster or greater mortality. In hard or tough tissue...the game may be different. The rotation/torque may be advantageous in achieving deeper penetration or maybe dealing with bone. The problem is all the variables inherent in any broadhead wound...so many variables it really prevents proving...through reproducible results...just how any broadhead will act on a given shot.