Sig 10K Gen 2 vs New Revic BR10 - Glass Quality

[pjohnson8168]

I see a handful of threads comparing the new Revics to Leica/Swaro etc but haven’t seen any against the Sig 10k Gen 2. I currently have the Sig’s but am curious on the glass specifically compared to the new Revics. I am relatively happy with the sigs, the glass is decent but as always looking for a better optics package to bring to the woods. As the laser and ballistic software of each is more than sufficient, does anyone have experience with the glass differences between these two?

 

[lintond]

I bought both new to compare. I think the Revic has a slight edge but not huge difference. I got my 10k at a discount so the $1k price difference was what drove me to keep the 10k.

You could always buy the Revic and return them. That’s what I did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AZ Gator]

I’m surprised by the lack of reviews for the BR10. There were tons when the Sig gen 2 hit the market and even vectronix. It would be nice to see area 419 add these Revics to the big lineup and see how things stack up. Maybe they’re waiting for another new bino so there’s more to talk about though?

 

[pjohnson8168]

I agree AZ, seemed like when the Gen 1 Revics came out it was like the second coming of Christ, the Gen 2 seems to be much more muted. Perhaps it was the time of year but I only see short 3 min reviews.

I tried the Gen 1 Revics but was not very impressed with the glass and focus wheel, thought the 10k Gen 2 were better for me. I did order the new Revics so will see if my opinions change.