Seating depth - does it even matter?

[Harvey_NW]

You talk purty.



P

 

[Jhaury7]

 

[bmart2622]

The only reason they wouldn't is if they don't do their part

You got it!! Those 2 flyers were me!!!

 

[bmart2622]

You talk purty.



P

By purty do you me factual?!?!?

 

[Buglebrush]

I'm not discrediting anyone's experience, I'm just looking for proof. Happen to have pics of those 10-20 shot comparisons? That's exactly what I was hoping to get.

I don't have my target papers anymore. Like I said, the ABLR'S Tangent Ojive is a different beast. I wouldn't expect its results to correlate with many other rounds.

 

[bmart2622]

^^^^^^^ Now that is a legit 0.5moa gun all day!!!!

 

[Harvey_NW]

……with factory ammo

Imagine the potential if you found a seating depth "node"..

 

[Pharmseller]

By purty do you me factual?!?!?

Nah, I jest like them big words.





P

 

[bmart2622]

We call that facts and knowledge. The above groups show valid sample sizes

 

[Pharmseller]

We call that facts and knowledge. The above groups show valid sample sizes

Do you mean TK-421’s groups?




P

 

[bmart2622]

100%

 

[Pharmseller]

100%

Help me out then, his groups are 5 shots and you said 10 shots minimum, 20 is better.




P

 

[bmart2622]

How many 5 shot groups did he shoot?

 

[Pharmseller]

How many 5 shot groups did he shoot?

Okay.

So again, help me out. Are you saying that four 5-shot groups, shot at different targets, is the same as one 20-shot group?




P

 

[bmart2622]

Yes

 

[bmart2622]

I dont shoot more than 5 at the same target because you start to lose impacts

 

[Pharmseller]

Thank you for your reply.




P

 

[bmart2622]

Regardless, more than 4

 

[Pharmseller]

Bare minimum of 10, 20 is better

Regardless, more than 4

Just looking for clarity.




P

 

[Pharmseller]

I dont shoot more than 5 at the same target because you start to lose impacts

Help me understand this statement. If you lose impacts, it means the bullet lands inside of the outermost holes, yes? Which tells you that the observation is within the mean, yes? Which increases the confidence that the group size is predictive and not a result of variation, yes? And therefore has value.



P