I get it, same in ND for the standing crop rule. But in the end standing crops are typically the fault of weather and not a lazy farmer. A 1/4 section of standing corn is about $100K. I don't think the farmer would choose to have that out there all winter and what you suggest the fish and game do? Ask for the money back because of an act of God all while the farmers is in good faith? End of the day a standing corn field until March is a net positive for wildlife and net negative for a farmer.
I get it that there are no simple solutions. And watching most farmers take advantage of and suck off the government's teat and seeing how easy it is sometimes is frustrating for all of us. But I grew up rural and all my best friends and family are farmers, and they don't receive the "this land is your land, this land is my land" message very well. The rural crowd is an ornery and stubborn bunch, I know because I'm part of it. So I'm just saying be careful how this is approached or you will see a gigantic decline in overall opportunity.
Not due to weather or field conditions. I no longer hunt this side of the state so they can have it either way, but when I did it was frustrating to see large stands of corn on land that was surrounded by harvested fields supposedly, "Public access."
I hunt private access land out west and love it. Except for the bulls. Those ranchers must have a sense of humor putting those big folkers out there.