Poser
WKR
When you're checking out new areas, particularly when you're looking for areas that are overlooked for various reasons, do you find it relatively easy to determine whether or not an area is receiving regular hunting pressure?
-no fire rings
-no cairns
- no stonemasonry windbreaks at the obvious glassing areas
-no flagging or bright eyes
-no trimmed limbs or cut logs
-no stacks of timber for wall tent structure
-no trash or shell casings
-no bones/skulls wedged in tree/limb forks
-no horse tack laying around
-no horse poop
You go into an area and see no sign that anyone has been there in a long time, do you find that reliably translates into not seeing anyone there during hunting season?
Likewise, do you find it relatively easy to determine that an area is being actively hunted or not?
Seems to me that any area to that is getting even somewhat regular use by people/hunters possesses all of the predictable sign in all of the predictable locations. Do you find empirical consistency in that observation?
-no fire rings
-no cairns
- no stonemasonry windbreaks at the obvious glassing areas
-no flagging or bright eyes
-no trimmed limbs or cut logs
-no stacks of timber for wall tent structure
-no trash or shell casings
-no bones/skulls wedged in tree/limb forks
-no horse tack laying around
-no horse poop
You go into an area and see no sign that anyone has been there in a long time, do you find that reliably translates into not seeing anyone there during hunting season?
Likewise, do you find it relatively easy to determine that an area is being actively hunted or not?
Seems to me that any area to that is getting even somewhat regular use by people/hunters possesses all of the predictable sign in all of the predictable locations. Do you find empirical consistency in that observation?