Sooo. Shooting my tikka I quickly set up 2 years ago with a basic vortex crossfire I have found scope no longer holding zero. Rifle still holds zero well. Either way, I’m putting the Leupold vx5hd from my ridgeline fft that, for my purposes has been flawless, on the tikka. I will
Be getting the trijiicon Huron 2.5-10x40 for the ridgeline. Now here’s my inquiry, from what I understand, the 30mm being a larger tube is slightly more durable (going on 300wm) allows for more adjustment (which I won’t need) , and in theory allows for more light.
I also believe, that the 1” tube models let in more light already than your eyes can use, if that makes sense. So is the 30mm tube worth it? I do like the power variable of 2.5-10 vs 3-9 but again, in reality am I going to notice .5 magnification.
My hunting is done on the east coast and my furthest shots taken were out to 350.
So why a 30 mm tube over a 1” tube?
Be getting the trijiicon Huron 2.5-10x40 for the ridgeline. Now here’s my inquiry, from what I understand, the 30mm being a larger tube is slightly more durable (going on 300wm) allows for more adjustment (which I won’t need) , and in theory allows for more light.
I also believe, that the 1” tube models let in more light already than your eyes can use, if that makes sense. So is the 30mm tube worth it? I do like the power variable of 2.5-10 vs 3-9 but again, in reality am I going to notice .5 magnification.
My hunting is done on the east coast and my furthest shots taken were out to 350.
So why a 30 mm tube over a 1” tube?
