S2H Scope Interest

[Tommyhaak]

Just finished getting three days of use on these scopes. Love the reticle, the glass, the low pro turrets and big numbers on the adjustments (@mtnwrunner)in a much smaller and lighter package than an Nx8, RS 1.2, or SWFA. It’s superior in comparison with all things considered. So far so good on reliability. Count me in if it stays that way.

 

[Shortschaf]

Thank you.

I would be a little surprised if they don't EVENTUALLY offer in MOA though

 

[Bluumoon]

I would be a little surprised if they don't EVENTUALLY offer in MOA though

Don't be. The entire goal of RS (for some) is to leverage our collective presence and exuberance (when we finally understand what works) to get certain things made the way they should be and to shift the industry as a whole.

 

[Gstew1930]

Don't be. The entire goal of RS (for some) is to leverage our collective presence and exuberance (when we finally understand what works) to get certain things made the way they should be and to shift the industry as a whole.

Well said!!

 

[Okie_Poke]

Just finished getting three days of use on these scopes. Love the reticle, the glass, the low pro turrets and big numbers on the adjustments (@mtnwrunner)in a much smaller and lighter package than an Nx8, RS 1.2, or SWFA. It’s superior in comparison with all things considered. So far so good on reliability. Count me in if it stays that way.

I'm in on this scope as I've previously said, but would you mind elaborating a bit on what you mean as compared to each of these? Below is my understanding of the specs/differences and "much smaller and lighter" seems like unhelpful puffery, unless it refers to something other than the length and weight dimensions of the scopes. Thanks.

Scope​	Weight (oz.)​	Length (in.)​
S2H 3-18	25.0*	12.5*
NX8 2.5-20	28.3	12.0
NX8 4-32	28.6	13.4
RS1.2 2.5-15	26.4	14.05
SWFA 3-15	22.7	13.7
SWFA 3-9	19.8	13.08

* estimated based on forum posts. Other scope specs taken from mfg specifications page.

 

[Chris in TN]

Don't be. The entire goal of RS (for some) is to leverage our collective presence and exuberance (when we finally understand what works) to get certain things made the way they should be and to shift the industry as a whole.

Inductive reasoning (ex: an extremely tiny subset/sample of shooters are faster with mrads, ergo mrads must be superior, it couldn't possibly be a bias in the sample selection process) mixed with exuberance....

Well, it's not like that's ever went wrong in history. At least you have that going for you.

Everybody *really does* want to rule the world. Sigh.